A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayWisconsin
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 am
HomeUCLA
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Wisconsin44 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
UCLA40 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
AwayWisconsin
CFB · 2026 Season · Week 7MATCHUP MAPOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 am
HomeUCLA
Matchup Foundation
What supports the team-level read
Overall edgeUCLA +1.5Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeUCLA +4.4Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context2.4 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
WWisconsin
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
UUCLA
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: UCLA +4.4 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Wisconsin
Outperform the overall team gapWISC does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
UCLA
Outperform the overall team gapUCLA does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Aging · 11.8 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
UCLA-167
Wisconsin+128
Total2 sides
Over +45.5-169
Under +45.5+127
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupWisconsin role shape ↔ UCLA secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two48.9% / 66.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Wisconsin has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Tyrell Henry. Compare that involvement pattern with the available UCLA secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupWisconsin role shape ↔ UCLA front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two37.1% / 62.9%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Wisconsin has a distributed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Abu Sama III. Compare that involvement pattern with the available UCLA front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupUCLA role shape ↔ Wisconsin secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two31.6% / 57.9%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
UCLA has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Semaj Morgan. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Wisconsin secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupUCLA role shape ↔ Wisconsin front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two43.8% / 76.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
UCLA has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Wayne Knight. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Wisconsin front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
WWisconsin
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
UUCLA
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
WRoster context only
0%
URoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
WBuilding
59%
UBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Colton JosephQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost12
Passing Yards752
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns5
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth27
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Nico IamaleavaQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost34
Passing Yards611
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.1
Passing Touchdowns3
Madden IamaleavaQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth56
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Harrison BortolottiRB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Mason LaneRB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Abu Sama IIIRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards156
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.8
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards5
Darrion DupreeRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards82
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.1
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards16
Bryan JacksonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards57
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts15
Nate PalmerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards31
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.9
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts8
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jaivian ThomasRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards131
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.2
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards13
Wayne KnightRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards345
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.8
Rushing Touchdowns8
Receiving Yards53
Anthony WoodsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards228
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.9
Rushing Touchdowns3
Rushing Attempts29
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth40
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Eugene Hilton Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards69
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.9
Receiving Longest Reception20
Receiving Receptions7
Tyrell HenryWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards293
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.3
Receiving Longest Reception51
Receiving Receptions22
Chris Brooks Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards168
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg21
Receiving Longest Reception75
Receiving Receptions8
Emmett BorkTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards7
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions1
Grant StecTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards20
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6.7
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions3
Malachi ColemanWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards76
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19
Receiving Longest Reception28
Receiving Receptions4
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth58
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brayden LoftinTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards27
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.5
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions2
Brian Rowe Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards156
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.6
Receiving Longest Reception45
Receiving Receptions10
Harry LodgeTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards4
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4
Receiving Longest Reception4
Receiving Receptions1
Jalen Saint PaulWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5.5
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions2
Landon EllisWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards42
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.5
Receiving Longest Reception20
Receiving Receptions4
Leland SmithWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards59
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.7
Receiving Longest Reception27
Receiving Receptions3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
WWisconsin
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
UUCLA
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Charles PerkinsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
DeNigel CooperDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Dillan JohnsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Hammond Russell IVDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Jake AndersonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Junior PoyserDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
A.J. FuimaonoDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles4
Aiden GobairaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Amier WashingtonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Ashton SandersDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Cole CogshellDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
Darold DengoheDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aaron WittLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Cooper CatalanoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles16
Defense Tackles26
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Landon GauthierLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Mason PosaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks0
Michael GarnerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Nicolas ClaytonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Anthony SaccaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Donavyn PellotLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Jalen WoodsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles29
Defense Unassisted Tackles15
Defense Sacks1
Jewelous WallsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Samuel OmosighoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles33
Defense Unassisted Tackles22
Defense Sacks3
Scott TaylorLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0.5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bryce WestCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Cai BatesDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Cairo SkanesCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Carson Van DinterDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Eric FletcherCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jai'Mier ScottCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cole MartinDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Dante LovettCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
DJ BarksdaleDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Malik HartfordS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Mason RiveraS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Osiris GilbertDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
WWisconsin
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Gavin LahmPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts90.9
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct7
UUCLA
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Mateen BhaghaniPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
84 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Wisconsin44 player profiles · 0 current
Colton JosephQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost12
Passing Yards752
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns5
Harrison BortolottiRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Eugene Hilton Jr.WR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards69
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.9
Receiving Longest Reception20
Receiving Receptions7
Charles PerkinsDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Aaron WittLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Bryce WestCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Gavin LahmPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts90.9
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct7
Donovan Dunmore— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
UCLA40 player profiles · 0 current
Nico IamaleavaQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost34
Passing Yards611
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.1
Passing Touchdowns3
Jaivian ThomasRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards131
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.2
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards13
Brayden LoftinTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards27
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.5
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions2
A.J. FuimaonoDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles4
Anthony SaccaLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Cole MartinDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Mateen BhaghaniPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Madden IamaleavaQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
