A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayWashington State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 6:00 pm
HomeOregon State
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Washington State43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Oregon State51 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeOREG +3.6Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeOREG +19.2Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context14.4 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
WSWashington State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
OSOregon State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: OREG +19.2 across at least 6 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityMedium confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementMedium confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
WASH has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
WS lean · Medium confidence
2
Current form and the broader team read disagree
The current-season read (OREG +19.2) is materially different from the broader team read (OREG +3.6), increasing uncertainty around which signal will hold.
Even lean · Medium confidence
3
Historical context still matters
Earlier team evidence is still materially influencing the matchup read, so uncertainty should remain higher until current-season evidence deepens.
Even lean · Medium confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Washington State
Outperform the overall team gapWASH does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Oregon State
Make the overall team edge holdOREG owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupWashington State role shape ↔ Oregon State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two31.3% / 62.5%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Washington State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Darrius Clemons. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Oregon State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupWashington State role shape ↔ Oregon State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two45.8% / 79.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Washington State has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Kirby Vorhees. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Oregon State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupOregon State role shape ↔ Washington State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two29.8% / 51.1%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Oregon State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Aeryn Hampton. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Washington State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupOregon State role shape ↔ Washington State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two45.2% / 71.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Oregon State has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by AJ Newberry. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Washington State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
WSWashington State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
OSOregon State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
WSRoster context only
0%
OSRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
WSBuilding
59%
OSBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Caden PinnickQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost40
Passing Yards403
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6
Passing Touchdowns2
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Braden AtkinsonQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost52
Passing Yards1,122
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.7
Passing Touchdowns8
Brady JonesQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards5
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg2.5
Passing Touchdowns0
Maalik MurphyQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards28
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth30
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Kirby VorheesRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards171
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.3
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards15
Leo PulalasiRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards34
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards12
Maxwell WoodsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards153
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards32
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth46
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
AJ NewberryRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards70
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards127
Jake ReichleRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards21
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards14
Kourdey GlassRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards25
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards15
Cornell Hatcher Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards50
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts11
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth53
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daniel BloodWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards104
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.4
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions10
Branden GanashamoorthyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards78
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.6
Receiving Longest Reception23
Receiving Receptions5
Tank HawkinsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards35
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.5
Receiving Longest Reception30
Receiving Receptions2
Beau BakerTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards12
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions1
Darrius ClemonsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards100
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions10
Jack PedersenTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards15
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg3.8
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions4
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth58
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aeryn HamptonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards172
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.3
Receiving Longest Reception28
Receiving Receptions14
Aaron ButlerWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards68
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.6
Receiving Longest Reception27
Receiving Receptions5
D.C. TempleTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards61
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6.8
Receiving Longest Reception14
Receiving Receptions9
Eric OlsenTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards92
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.2
Receiving Longest Reception24
Receiving Receptions10
Gabe MilbournTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards3
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg1.5
Receiving Longest Reception2
Receiving Receptions2
Jackson BowersTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards8
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
WSWashington State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
OSOregon State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster15
Player profiles15
Current0
Relevant15
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth195
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ben BeattyDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Damarjhe LewisDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
DJ WarnerDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack5
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles12
Eduwa OkundayeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Ike OkaforDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Jirah LeaupepeteleDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daniel MatagiDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Jacob SchusterDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Jaylen HillDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Nick NorrisDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Niklas FisherDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Tevita Pome'eDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Carsten ReynoldsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Gage JonesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Gavin FugateLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Isaiah HungLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles11
Defense Sacks0
Jack EllisonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Keith BrownLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles16
Defense Unassisted Tackles13
Defense Sacks0
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adrian OnyiegoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Aiden SullivanLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles16
Defense Tackles26
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks1
Dylan LayneLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Gyriece GoodmanLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Jabari OdoemenemLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles13
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Kord ShawLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
CJ SolisLumarCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Jack BalDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jalil TuckerDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jamarey SmithCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jeremiah BernardS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Kai RapollaCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Blake ThompsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Drake VickersDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Isaiah HouiDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jaheim PattersonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Milan ClarkDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Sailasa VadrawaleDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return24
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
WSWashington State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jack StevensPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts88.9
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards20
Kicking Field Goals Made9
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
OSOregon State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Caleb OjedaPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards50
Kicking Field Goals Made10
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
94 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Washington State43 player profiles · 0 current
Caden PinnickQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost40
Passing Yards403
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6
Passing Touchdowns2
Kirby VorheesRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards171
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.3
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards15
Daniel BloodWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards104
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.4
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions10
Ben BeattyDE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Carsten ReynoldsLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
CJ SolisLumarCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Jack StevensPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts88.9
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards20
Kicking Field Goals Made9
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Leo PulalasiRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards34
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards12
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Oregon State51 player profiles · 0 current
Braden AtkinsonQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost52
Passing Yards1,122
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.7
Passing Touchdowns8
AJ NewberryRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards70
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards127
Aeryn HamptonWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards172
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.3
Receiving Longest Reception28
Receiving Receptions14
Daniel MatagiDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Adrian OnyiegoLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Blake ThompsonDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Caleb OjedaPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards50
Kicking Field Goals Made10
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Jesse Legree— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
