A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayWake Forest
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 am
HomeCalifornia
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Wake Forest45 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
California51 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
AwayWake Forest
CFB · 2026 Season · Week 7MATCHUP MAPOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 am
HomeCalifornia
Matchup Foundation
What supports the team-level read
Overall edgeWAKE +6.7Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeWAKE +8.3Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context0.4 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
WFWake Forest
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
CCalifornia
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Team StrengthWF · Moderate edge
High84% confidence
WAKE leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 5%
The broad team read combines final results, schedule quality and bounded recent/historical context without using this game’s betting line.
Evidence: Independent projected margin: WAKE +6.7. Target-game spread, moneyline, and total are excluded from the score.
Schedule StrengthWF · Moderate edge
High77% confidence
WAKE leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 5%
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: WAKE +1.1 · CALI -1.4.
Current FormWF · Strong edge
High78% confidence
WAKE strong edgeEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 5%
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: WAKE +8.3 across at least 6 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
WAKE has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
WF lean · High confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Wake Forest
Make the overall team edge holdWAKE owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
California
Outperform the overall team gapCALI does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context1
Passing matchupWake Forest role shape ↔ California secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two35.0% / 51.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Wake Forest has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Carlos Hernandez. Compare that involvement pattern with the available California secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupWake Forest role shape ↔ California front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two91.7% / 100.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Wake Forest has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Ty Clark III. Compare that involvement pattern with the available California front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupCalifornia role shape ↔ Wake Forest secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two33.3% / 56.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
California has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Chase Hendricks. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Wake Forest secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupCalifornia role shape ↔ Wake Forest front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two75.9% / 87.3%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
California has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Adam Mohammed. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Wake Forest front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
WFWake Forest
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
CCalifornia
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
WFRoster context only
0%
CRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
WFBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth37
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Steele PizzellaQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards6
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg2
Passing Touchdowns0
Gio LopezQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost31
Passing Yards887
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.4
Passing Touchdowns7
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth27
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
JaronKeawe SagapoluteleQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost27
Passing Yards866
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8
Passing Touchdowns7
Jackson BrousseauQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards99
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6.2
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth15
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ty Clark IIIRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards144
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards13
Jamar SearcyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards9
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts2
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth53
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adam MohammedRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards285
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards138
Anthony LeagueRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards15
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards11
Ashten EmoryRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards24
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards15
Carter VargasRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards14
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards6
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth55
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Drayden DickmannWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards26
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.7
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions3
Antonio MeeksWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards134
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.1
Receiving Longest Reception72
Receiving Receptions7
Bryce KaniaWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards53
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.3
Receiving Longest Reception24
Receiving Receptions4
Carlos HernandezWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards322
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.3
Receiving Longest Reception78
Receiving Receptions21
Hugh O'BrienWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards6
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions1
Jack FoleyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards118
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.7
Receiving Longest Reception49
Receiving Receptions6
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth63
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jordan KingWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards52
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.7
Receiving Longest Reception26
Receiving Receptions6
Chase HendricksWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards195
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.8
Receiving Longest Reception31
Receiving Receptions20
Carson PerrSmithWR
Earlier data
Rushing Attempts4
Rushing Longest Rush7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Yards12
Cooper PerryWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards76
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.2
Receiving Longest Reception19
Receiving Receptions5
Dorian ThomasTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards7
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions1
Ian StrongWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards206
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.7
Receiving Longest Reception49
Receiving Receptions14
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
WFWake Forest
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
CCalifornia
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brandon SmileyDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Camden HardyDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Dallas AfalavaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles11
Gabe KirschkeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles12
Josiah PrattDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Kadear DembeleDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack9
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ashun ShepphardDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Derek WilkinsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles4
Jayden WilliamsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Jericho JohnsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Joshua PierceDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
LeBron WilliamsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth52
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aiden HallLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles17
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Buom JockLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Frank CusanoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles17
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Whittman WhaleyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aaron HamptonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
AJ TuiteleLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
Beckham BarneyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Jayden WayneLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0.5
Jude McLellanLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Kamar MothudiLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster13
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ashaad WilliamsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Brian BladesDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Davaughn PattersonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles15
Devin CookDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Josh PattersonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Myles TurpinDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster14
Player profiles13
Current0
Relevant13
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth169
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aiden ManutaiDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Cam SidneyDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Isaiah CrosbyDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jae'On YoungDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jordan SanfordDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Khamani HudsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
WFWake Forest
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Connor CalvertPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards85.7
Kicking Field Goals Made8
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct6
CCalifornia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth14
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chase MeyerPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards50
Kicking Field Goals Made2
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Towns McGoughPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made9
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
96 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Wake Forest45 player profiles · 0 current
Steele PizzellaQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards6
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg2
Passing Touchdowns0
Ty Clark IIIRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards144
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards13
Drayden DickmannWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards26
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.7
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions3
Brandon SmileyDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Aiden HallLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles17
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Ashaad WilliamsDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Connor CalvertPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards85.7
Kicking Field Goals Made8
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct6
Deuce Dyce— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
California51 player profiles · 0 current
JaronKeawe SagapoluteleQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost27
Passing Yards866
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8
Passing Touchdowns7
Adam MohammedRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards285
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards138
Jordan KingWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards52
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.7
Receiving Longest Reception26
Receiving Receptions6
Ashun ShepphardDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Aaron HamptonLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Aiden ManutaiDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Chase MeyerPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards50
Kicking Field Goals Made2
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Dabe Nwude— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
