A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayUtah
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 am
HomeColorado
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Utah45 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Colorado48 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
AwayUtah
CFB · 2026 Season · Week 7MATCHUP MAPOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 am
HomeColorado
Matchup Foundation
What supports the team-level read
Overall edgeUTAH +17.0Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeUTAH +17.8Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context3.9 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
UUtah
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
CColorado
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: UTAH +17.8 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
COLO has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
C lean · High confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Utah
Make the overall team edge holdUTAH owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Colorado
Outperform the overall team gapCOLO does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupUtah role shape ↔ Colorado secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two40.5% / 54.1%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Utah has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Braden Pegan. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Colorado secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupUtah role shape ↔ Colorado front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two72.7% / 100.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Utah has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Wayshawn Parker. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Colorado front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupColorado role shape ↔ Utah secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two33.3% / 57.8%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Colorado has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by DeAndre Moore Jr.. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Utah secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupColorado role shape ↔ Utah front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two37.9% / 65.5%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Colorado has a distributed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Micah Welch. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Utah front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
UUtah
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
CColorado
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
URoster context only
0%
CRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
UBuilding
59%
CBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth37
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Byrd FicklinQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards166
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.8
Passing Touchdowns2
Devon DampierQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost14
Passing Yards690
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.3
Passing Touchdowns7
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth27
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Julian LewisQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost37
Passing Yards658
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.3
Passing Touchdowns6
Isaac WilsonQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards-3
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg-1.5
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth15
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Wayshawn ParkerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards154
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards89
Steve ChavezSotoRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards63
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts12
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth45
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bryce HicksRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards7
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards-2
Jaquail SmithRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards152
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards1
Micah WelchRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards178
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.4
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards16
Damian Henderson IIRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards108
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts23
Richard YoungRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards13
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts4
Titus BautistaRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards7
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth45
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Braden PeganWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards235
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.7
Receiving Longest Reception37
Receiving Receptions15
Hunter AndrewsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards24
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions4
Creed WhittemoreWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards87
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.4
Receiving Longest Reception36
Receiving Receptions5
Kyri ShoelsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
Larry SimmonsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards95
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19
Receiving Longest Reception26
Receiving Receptions5
Mana CarvalhoWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards38
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19
Receiving Longest Reception23
Receiving Receptions2
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth81
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Joseph WilliamsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards234
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg21.3
Receiving Longest Reception63
Receiving Receptions11
Quentin GibsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards25
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4.2
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions6
Danny ScuderoWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards24
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4.8
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions5
DeAndre Moore Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards200
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.3
Receiving Longest Reception66
Receiving Receptions15
Ernest CampbellWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards48
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg48
Receiving Longest Reception48
Receiving Receptions1
Kamryn PerryWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards22
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.3
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
UUtah
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth26
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity2 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Cedric JeffersonOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Jireh MoeOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
CColorado
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth26
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity2 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Bo HughleyOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Chauncey GoodenOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ethan DayDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Karson KaufusiDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Kash DillonDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Lance HoltzclawDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Lucas SamsulaDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack5
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Mike TauteoliDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Dylan ManuelDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles7
Lamont LesterDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks4
Defense Yards Lost On Sack29
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles9
Quency WigginsDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles6
Samu TaumanupepeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles4
Santana HopperDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles5
Toby AneneDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth44
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cyrus PoluLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1.5
Elijah EllissLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles13
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks1
Johnathan HallLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks1
Mateaki HeluLB
Earlier data
Rushing Attempts6
Rushing Longest Rush14
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Yards36
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Gage GoldbergLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Gideon LampronLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Immanuel EzeoguLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Kylan SalterLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Liona LefauLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles16
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Randon FontenetteLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles25
Defense Unassisted Tackles14
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles12
Current0
Relevant12
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth156
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brock FonoimoanaS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Elijah DavisCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Elijah ReedDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jackson BenneeS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return1
Defense Assisted Tackles3
James ChenaultCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
JC HartCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ben FinnesethS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Boo CarterDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Cree ThomasCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Jah Jah BoydDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Jason Stokes Jr.CB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Justin EaglinCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
UUtah
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth19
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Dillon CurtisPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Tanner CragunPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made2
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Orion PhillipsP
Earlier data
Rushing Attempts1
Rushing Longest Rush2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Yards2
CColorado
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth14
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daniel GerlachPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made2
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Elliot ArnoldPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards50
Kicking Field Goals Made8
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
93 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Utah45 player profiles · 0 current
Byrd FicklinQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards166
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.8
Passing Touchdowns2
Wayshawn ParkerRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards154
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards89
Braden PeganWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards235
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.7
Receiving Longest Reception37
Receiving Receptions15
Ethan DayDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Cyrus PoluLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1.5
Brock FonoimoanaS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Dillon CurtisPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Cedric JeffersonOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Colorado48 player profiles · 0 current
Julian LewisQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost37
Passing Yards658
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.3
Passing Touchdowns6
Bryce HicksRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards7
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards-2
Joseph WilliamsWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards234
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg21.3
Receiving Longest Reception63
Receiving Receptions11
Dylan ManuelDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles7
Gage GoldbergLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Ben FinnesethS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Daniel GerlachPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made2
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Bo HughleyOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
