A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayUMass
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 1:00 pm
HomeBuffalo
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
UMass49 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Buffalo45 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeBUFF +4.3Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeUMAS +5.6Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context11.2 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
UUMass
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
BBuffalo
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: UMAS +5.6 across at least 6 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityMedium confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
UMAS has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
U lean · High confidence
2
Current form and the broader team read disagree
The current-season read (UMAS +5.6) is materially different from the broader team read (BUFF +4.3), increasing uncertainty around which signal will hold.
Even lean · Medium confidence
3
Historical context still matters
Earlier team evidence is still materially influencing the matchup read, so uncertainty should remain higher until current-season evidence deepens.
Even lean · Medium confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
UMass
Outperform the overall team gapUMAS does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Buffalo
Make the overall team edge holdBUFF owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupUMass role shape ↔ Buffalo secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two27.8% / 50.0%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
UMass has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by T.Y. Harding. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Buffalo secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupUMass role shape ↔ Buffalo front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two80.4% / 92.2%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
UMass has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Elijah Faulkner. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Buffalo front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupBuffalo role shape ↔ UMass secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two62.5% / 75.0%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Buffalo has a concentrated recorded receptions usage pattern led by Chance Morrow. Compare that involvement pattern with the available UMass secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupBuffalo role shape ↔ UMass front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two32.0% / 62.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Buffalo has a distributed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Messiah Burch. Compare that involvement pattern with the available UMass front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
UUMass
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
BBuffalo
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
URoster context only
0%
BRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
UBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth21
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
William Watson IIIQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost12
Passing Yards509
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.9
Passing Touchdowns5
Logan InagawaQB
Earlier data
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions1
Receiving Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards10
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jason WrightQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost18
Passing Yards245
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4.7
Passing Touchdowns2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Elijah FaulknerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards195
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards38
Jordan WashingtonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards38
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts6
Justin WilliamsThomasRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards15
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts4
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth30
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Messiah BurchRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards100
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards9
Terrance Shelton Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards75
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards11
James McNeil Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards105
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts23
Nino HillRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards20
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts6
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth63
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Joseph Griffin Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards134
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.8
Receiving Longest Reception39
Receiving Receptions8
Kezion DiaJohnsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards17
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.5
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions2
Reece AdkinsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards38
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.5
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions4
T.Y. HardingWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards177
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.7
Receiving Longest Reception51
Receiving Receptions10
Dallas ElliottWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards48
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.6
Receiving Longest Reception17
Receiving Receptions5
Jax MarkovichTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards8
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions1
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chance MorrowWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards249
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.4
Receiving Longest Reception57
Receiving Receptions20
Dwayne Early Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards28
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions4
Jasaiah GathingsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions3
Michael GelatkoTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards15
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15
Receiving Longest Reception15
Receiving Receptions1
Patrick Clacks IIIWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards22
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception15
Receiving Receptions2
Phillip FolmarWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards5
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg2.5
Receiving Longest Reception3
Receiving Receptions2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
UUMass
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
BBuffalo
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles12
Current0
Relevant12
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth156
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Andrew DepaepeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Aubrey MelvinDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack9
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Colin ReynoldsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Hollis DirstineDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Jerry WashingtonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Joshua NoblesDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles8
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Caleb OliverDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Christopher ClimesDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Cornell EvansDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Jacari BennettDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Noah WhitmerEDGE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Rex StinchcombDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
David TimsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Dinos DrossosLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Joshua IseahLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Timmy HinspeterLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles17
Defense Tackles24
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Tyler MartinLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0.5
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bradley IlungaBisseleleLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Joey CheshireLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Mathew HiltyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
SaVeon BrownLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles15
Defense Sacks1
Stevie BraceyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles9
Defense Sacks1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
DD Snyder IIS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Isaiah ReedDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return1
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Jahmad HarmonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions3
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return34
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kendall BournesS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Michael PangaroS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Michael Robinson IIDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Donovan RodriguezCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jamiere MunsonS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
John KeoughS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Keontez BradleyCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Kobi BlackwellCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Mikey CrawfordCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
UUMass
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Derek MorrisPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts91.7
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards87.5
Kicking Field Goals Made12
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct7
BBuffalo
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth33
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ethan StumpfP
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Joseph StoeverLS
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Oliver HautanenPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made4
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
94 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
UMass49 player profiles · 0 current
William Watson IIIQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost12
Passing Yards509
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.9
Passing Touchdowns5
Elijah FaulknerRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards195
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards38
Joseph Griffin Jr.WR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards134
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.8
Receiving Longest Reception39
Receiving Receptions8
Andrew DepaepeDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
David TimsonLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
DD Snyder IIS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Derek MorrisPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts91.7
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards87.5
Kicking Field Goals Made12
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct7
Chris Stanley— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Buffalo45 player profiles · 0 current
Jason WrightQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost18
Passing Yards245
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4.7
Passing Touchdowns2
Messiah BurchRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards100
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards9
Chance MorrowWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards249
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.4
Receiving Longest Reception57
Receiving Receptions20
Caleb OliverDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Bradley IlungaBisseleleLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Donovan RodriguezCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ethan StumpfP · Specialists
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Elijah Holmes— · Other
Earlier data
Passing Attempts61
Passing Completion Pct57.4
Passing Completions35
Passing Interceptions0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
