A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayOklahoma State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 7:30 pm
HomeHouston
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Oklahoma State48 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Houston44 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeHOUS +11.3Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeHOUS +7.1Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context7.4 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
OSOklahoma State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
HHouston
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: HOUS +7.1 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
Historical context still matters
Earlier team evidence is still materially influencing the matchup read, so uncertainty should remain higher until current-season evidence deepens.
Even lean · Medium confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Oklahoma State
Outperform the overall team gapOKLA does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Houston
Make the overall team edge holdHOUS owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Fresh · 3.5 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
Houston-167
Oklahoma State+128
Total2 sides
Over +57.5-112
Under +57.5-115
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupOklahoma State role shape ↔ Houston secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two23.9% / 44.8%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Oklahoma State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Justin Bowick. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Houston secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupOklahoma State role shape ↔ Houston front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two60.5% / 81.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Oklahoma State has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Caleb Hawkins. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Houston front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupHouston role shape ↔ Oklahoma State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two36.7% / 69.4%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Houston has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Amare Thomas. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Oklahoma State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupHouston role shape ↔ Oklahoma State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two53.3% / 80.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Houston has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Makhi Hughes. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Oklahoma State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
OSOklahoma State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
HHouston
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
OSRoster context only
0%
HRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
OSBuilding
59%
HBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth29
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Drew MestemakerQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost19
Passing Yards882
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.7
Passing Touchdowns8
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth21
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Conner WeigmanQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost10
Passing Yards707
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns7
Luke CarneyQB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards23
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.8
Rushing Attempts4
Rushing Longest Rush8
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ayo AdeyiRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards115
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards15
Caleb HawkinsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards261
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards43
Tre Page IIIRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards83
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts16
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth35
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
DJ ButlerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards83
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards1
Makhi HughesRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards213
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.3
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards36
Re'Shaun Sanford IIRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards132
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.6
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards86
Nehemiah WarmateRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards41
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth55
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chris BarnesWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards87
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.4
Receiving Longest Reception39
Receiving Receptions7
Wyatt YoungWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards218
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.6
Receiving Longest Reception52
Receiving Receptions14
Carson KolbTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards23
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5.8
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions4
Israel PolkWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards12
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions1
Justin BowickWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards281
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.6
Receiving Longest Reception36
Receiving Receptions16
Kam PowellWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards14
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4.7
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions3
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth53
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Tyson TurnerWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Koby YoungWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards149
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg24.8
Receiving Longest Reception47
Receiving Receptions6
Amare ThomasWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards237
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.2
Receiving Longest Reception37
Receiving Receptions18
Jaquise MartinWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
Kaleb ThomasTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards4
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4
Receiving Longest Reception4
Receiving Receptions1
Luke McgaryTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards10
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
OSOklahoma State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
HHouston
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity1 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Anthony BoswellOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Billy Walton IIIDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
DJ Jackson Jr.DE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Enai WhiteDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Iman OatesDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Jaleel JohnsonDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack5
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
James WilliamsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chance BryantDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Darius WashingtonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
De'Marion ThomasDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
DK MaysDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Ejiroghene EgodogbareDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Khalil LaufauDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Braylon RigsbyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Ethan WesloskiLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles13
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0.5
Gunnar WilsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Isaiah ChisomLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles13
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0.5
Malik CharlesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks1
Tate RomneyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks0
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ashton PorterLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1
Brandon MackLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Carmycah GlassLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Christian BrathwaiteLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Jaden YatesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks0.5
Latreveon McCutchinLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Christian BodnarCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kobi ForemanCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kollin LewisCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
LaDainian FieldsCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Markeith WilliamsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Maurion HornDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
C.J. DouglasDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
J.D. RhymDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jalen MayoCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Javion WhiteDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Johnsley BarbasDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kentrell WebbDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
OSOklahoma State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Sam KeltnerPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made12
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct6
HHouston
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Weston EdwardsLS
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Jonathan DimasPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts94.1
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
92 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Oklahoma State48 player profiles · 0 current
Drew MestemakerQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost19
Passing Yards882
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.7
Passing Touchdowns8
Ayo AdeyiRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards115
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards15
Chris BarnesWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards87
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.4
Receiving Longest Reception39
Receiving Receptions7
Billy Walton IIIDE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Braylon RigsbyLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Christian BodnarCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Sam KeltnerPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made12
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct6
Broderick Vehrs— · Other
Earlier data
Passing Attempts6
Passing Completion Pct100
Passing Completions6
Passing Interceptions0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Houston44 player profiles · 0 current
Conner WeigmanQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost10
Passing Yards707
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns7
DJ ButlerRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards83
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards1
Tyson TurnerWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Chance BryantDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Ashton PorterLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1
C.J. DouglasDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Weston EdwardsLS · Specialists
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Anthony BoswellOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
