A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayOhio State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 pm
HomeIndiana
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Ohio State58 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Indiana43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeINDI +3.6Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeINDI +2.9Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context1.8 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
OSOhio State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
IIndiana
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Team StrengthI · Slight edge
High84% confidence
INDI leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 50%
The broad team read combines final results, schedule quality and bounded recent/historical context without using this game’s betting line.
Evidence: Independent projected margin: INDI +3.6. Target-game spread, moneyline, and total are excluded from the score.
Schedule StrengthI · Slight edge
High77% confidence
INDI leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 50%
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: OHIO +2.9 · INDI +4.0.
Current FormI · Slight edge
High78% confidence
INDI leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 50%
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: INDI +2.9 across at least 6 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Ohio State
Outperform the overall team gapOHIO does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Indiana
Make the overall team edge holdINDI owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Fresh · 8.8 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
Indiana+112
Ohio State-145
Total2 sides
Over +49.5-114
Under +49.5-114
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context2
Passing matchupOhio State role shape ↔ Indiana secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two41.2% / 58.8%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Ohio State has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Jeremiah Smith. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Indiana secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupOhio State role shape ↔ Indiana front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two52.0% / 80.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Ohio State has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Bo Jackson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Indiana front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupIndiana role shape ↔ Ohio State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two31.6% / 60.5%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Indiana has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Charlie Becker. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Ohio State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupIndiana role shape ↔ Ohio State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two47.5% / 88.9%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Indiana has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Lee Beebe. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Ohio State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
OSOhio State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
IIndiana
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
BackfieldLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
ReceiversLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
OSRoster context only
0%
IRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
LinebackersLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
SecondaryLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
SpecialistsLimited context
OSBuilding
59%
IBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Julian SayinQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost33
Passing Yards839
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.6
Passing Touchdowns6
Tavien St. ClairQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards52
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.4
Passing Touchdowns1
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Grant WilsonQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost4
Passing Yards61
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg20.3
Passing Touchdowns2
Josh HooverQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost9
Passing Yards649
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg12.7
Passing Touchdowns10
Tyler CherryQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards10
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg3.3
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Stanley JacksonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards8
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Bo JacksonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards230
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.9
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards50
Isaiah WestRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards44
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.4
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards18
Ja'Kobi JacksonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards150
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.1
Rushing Touchdowns4
Rushing Attempts21
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Lee BeebeRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards195
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.1
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards2
Turbo RichardRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards315
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.7
Rushing Touchdowns4
Receiving Yards43
Sean CuonoRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards45
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.1
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts11
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth45
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jeremiah SmithWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards400
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19
Receiving Longest Reception48
Receiving Receptions21
Brandon InnissWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards133
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.6
Receiving Longest Reception49
Receiving Receptions8
Brody LennonTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards4
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4
Receiving Longest Reception4
Receiving Receptions1
Devin MccuinWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards131
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.6
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions9
Mason WilliamsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards35
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.7
Receiving Longest Reception23
Receiving Receptions3
Max LeBlancTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards6
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions1
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth35
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brock SchottTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards25
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg25
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions1
Charlie BeckerWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards272
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg22.7
Receiving Longest Reception79
Receiving Receptions12
Davion ChandlerWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards69
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.3
Receiving Longest Reception42
Receiving Receptions4
Jackson WasserstromWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards10
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions1
Nick MarshWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards169
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.4
Receiving Longest Reception51
Receiving Receptions11
Shazz PrestonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards81
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.2
Receiving Longest Reception39
Receiving Receptions5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
OSOhio State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
IIndiana
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Beau AtkinsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Eddrick HoustonDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Epi SitanileiDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
James SmithDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Jason MooreDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles9
John WalkerDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chiddi ObiazorDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Daniel NdukweDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
Joe HjelleDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Joshua BurnhamDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Keishaun CalhounDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack8
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Mario LandinoDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack9
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Christian AlliegroLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Garrett StoverLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Payton PierceLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Qua RussawLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Riley PettijohnLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1
Tarvos AlfordLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth52
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Isaiah JonesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles14
Defense Sacks0
Jeff UtzingerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
Kaiden TurnerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Rolijah HardyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles12
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brenten JonesS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Cameron CalhounDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Deshawn StewartS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Devin SanchezCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Dominick KellyDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Earl Little IIDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles10
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Amare FerrellDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Anthony ChungDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Byron Baldwin Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Carson WilliamsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jamari SharpeDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Jaylen BellDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
OSOhio State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Connor HawkinsPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
IIndiana
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth14
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Nicolas RadicicPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made7
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Paddy McAteerPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts92.3
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards50
Kicking Field Goals Made13
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
101 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Ohio State58 player profiles · 0 current
Julian SayinQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost33
Passing Yards839
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.6
Passing Touchdowns6
Stanley JacksonRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards8
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jeremiah SmithWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards400
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19
Receiving Longest Reception48
Receiving Receptions21
Beau AtkinsonDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Christian AlliegroLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Brenten JonesS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Connor HawkinsPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Luke Fahey— · Other
Earlier data
Passing Attempts11
Passing Completion Pct81.8
Passing Completions9
Passing Interceptions2
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Indiana43 player profiles · 0 current
Grant WilsonQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost4
Passing Yards61
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg20.3
Passing Touchdowns2
Lee BeebeRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards195
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.1
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards2
Brock SchottTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards25
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg25
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions1
Chiddi ObiazorDE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Isaiah JonesLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles14
Defense Sacks0
Amare FerrellDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Nicolas RadicicPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made7
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Cam McHaney— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
