A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayOhio
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 10:00 pm
HomeSacramento State
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Ohio43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Sacramento State59 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 4-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeOHIO +9.9Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeOHIO +10.9Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context1.8 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
OOhio
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
SSSacramento State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: OHIO +10.9 across at least 6 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Ohio
Make the overall team edge holdOHIO owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Sacramento State
Outperform the overall team gapSACR does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupOhio role shape ↔ Sacramento State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two44.4% / 69.4%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Ohio has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Riley Neer. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Sacramento State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupOhio role shape ↔ Sacramento State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two45.8% / 89.8%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Ohio has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Duncan Brune. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Sacramento State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupSacramento State role shape ↔ Ohio secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two32.8% / 61.2%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Sacramento State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Matthew Coleman. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Ohio secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupSacramento State role shape ↔ Ohio front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two50.9% / 87.3%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Sacramento State has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Jamar Curtis. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Ohio front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
OOhio
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
SSSacramento State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
ORoster context only
0%
SSRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
OBuilding
59%
SSBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Matt VezzaQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost14
Passing Yards193
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6.7
Passing Touchdowns3
Nick PoulosQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost7
Passing Yards180
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5
Passing Touchdowns1
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth37
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Carson ConklinQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost13
Passing Yards222
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4.8
Passing Touchdowns0
Jackson SharmanQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost14
Passing Yards635
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6.3
Passing Touchdowns5
Jaylen PattersonQB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards53
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg13.3
Rushing Attempts4
Rushing Longest Rush43
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth35
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Duncan BruneRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards98
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards23
Irving BrownRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards10
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards-5
Victor RosaRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards102
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.9
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards22
Mike Taylor Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards8
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts4
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cincere RhaneyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards86
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards5
Jamar CurtisRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards96
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.4
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards12
Elias BrownRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards25
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth74
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Andrew MetzgerTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions2
Khamani DebrowWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Miles CremascoliWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Preston BowmanWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards42
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.5
Receiving Longest Reception24
Receiving Receptions4
AJ MillerTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards28
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception14
Receiving Receptions3
Dom DorwartWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards107
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.9
Receiving Longest Reception21
Receiving Receptions9
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth58
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jordan WilliamsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards81
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.1
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions10
Matthew ColemanWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards327
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.9
Receiving Longest Reception63
Receiving Receptions22
Elijah HuddleTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards9
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions1
Ellijah WashingtonWR
Earlier data
Rushing Attempts1
Rushing Longest Rush-7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Yards-7
Jace WilsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards48
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16
Receiving Longest Reception24
Receiving Receptions3
Kyle KoontzTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards14
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
OOhio
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity1 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Sandro MalicevicOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
SSSacramento State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Derek ReagansDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Evan HerrmannDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Ike AckermanDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack25
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles13
Isaiah StreetDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Nathan HaleDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Nehemiah DukesDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles6
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Austin ChambersDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Brodie TagaloaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Isiah Chala Jr.DL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Ivan Moore Jr.DE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Jamel HowardDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Malachi KindleDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Charlie ChristopherLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Cody RaymondLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Jack FriesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Jermaine MinnisLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Michael MolnarLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles33
Defense Unassisted Tackles19
Defense Sacks0
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Alex RochaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles18
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks1
Darson JeantyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Derek HoustonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Diego DavisLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks1
Fata PulokaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks1
Jackson CahoonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Barry DillonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Bobby MillerCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Darren JamesHamiltonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
DJ MortonS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
DJ WalkerS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Eli ThompsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster15
Player profiles14
Current0
Relevant13
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth174
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adam TaylorCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Amari WallaceDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Boogsie SilveraDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles18
Caleb ReeseCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Diesel GordonS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Dionte ThorntonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
OOhio
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Will HryszkoPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards57.1
Kicking Field Goals Made7
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
SSSacramento State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Grant MeadorsPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made9
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
102 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Ohio43 player profiles · 0 current
Matt VezzaQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost14
Passing Yards193
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6.7
Passing Touchdowns3
Duncan BruneRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards98
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards23
Andrew MetzgerTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions2
Derek ReagansDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Charlie ChristopherLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Barry DillonDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Will HryszkoPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards57.1
Kicking Field Goals Made7
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Sandro MalicevicOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Sacramento State59 player profiles · 0 current
Carson ConklinQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost13
Passing Yards222
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4.8
Passing Touchdowns0
Cincere RhaneyRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards86
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards5
Jordan WilliamsTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards81
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.1
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions10
Austin ChambersDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Alex RochaLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles18
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks1
Adam TaylorCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Grant MeadorsPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made9
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Isaiah Ene— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
