A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayNotre Dame
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 7:30 pm
HomeBYU
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Notre Dame55 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
BYU56 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeNOTR +6.5Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeNOTR +6.9Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context1.5 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
NDNotre Dame
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
BBYU
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: NOTR +6.9 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Notre Dame
Make the overall team edge holdNOTR owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
BYU
Outperform the overall team gapBYU does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Fresh · 3.5 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
BYU+365
Notre Dame-556
Total2 sides
Over +45.5-169
Under +45.5+127
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupNotre Dame role shape ↔ BYU secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two26.5% / 53.1%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Notre Dame has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Micah Gilbert. Compare that involvement pattern with the available BYU secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupNotre Dame role shape ↔ BYU front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two46.4% / 91.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Notre Dame has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Nolan James Jr.. Compare that involvement pattern with the available BYU front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupBYU role shape ↔ Notre Dame secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two32.1% / 57.1%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
BYU has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Kyler Kasper. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Notre Dame secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupBYU role shape ↔ Notre Dame front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two64.6% / 80.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
BYU has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by LJ Martin. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Notre Dame front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
NDNotre Dame
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
BBYU
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
NDRoster context only
0%
BRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
NDBuilding
59%
BBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
C.J. CarrQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost9
Passing Yards726
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.9
Passing Touchdowns6
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bear BachmeierQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost15
Passing Yards642
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.4
Passing Touchdowns6
Treyson BourguetQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards15
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth30
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aneyas WilliamsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards144
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards22
Kedren YoungRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards16
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards19
Nolan James Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards169
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.3
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards73
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Sione I MoaRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards22
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
LJ MartinRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards328
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards41
Preston RexRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards73
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.3
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards8
Charles MiskaRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards9
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts2
Logan PayneRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards30
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth68
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Matt JefferyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards28
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions2
Cooper FlanaganTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards15
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions3
Elijah BurressWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards33
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception16
Receiving Receptions3
Jaden GreathouseWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards54
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.5
Receiving Longest Reception23
Receiving Receptions4
James FlaniganTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards10
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions2
Jerome Bettis Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards61
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg30.5
Receiving Longest Reception56
Receiving Receptions2
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth61
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Kyler KasperWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards116
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.9
Receiving Longest Reception29
Receiving Receptions9
Reggie FrischknechtWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards45
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg22.5
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions2
Jojo PhillipsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards39
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.8
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions5
Keayen NeadTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards6
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions1
Roger SaleapagaTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards28
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception17
Receiving Receptions3
Tiger BachmeierWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards5
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception5
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
NDNotre Dame
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
BBYU
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Armel MukamDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
Boubacar TraoreDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack21
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles5
Bryce YoungDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles10
Cole MullinsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Elijah HughesDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Francis BrewuDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster13
Player profiles12
Current0
Relevant12
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth156
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Anisi PurcellDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Bodie SchoonoverDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Hunter CleggDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Justin KirklandDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Keanu TanuvasaDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Kendal WallDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles9
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Drayk BowenLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles11
Defense Sacks0
Jaiden AusberryLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Jaylen SneedLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
Kahanu KiaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Kyngstonn ViliamuAsaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Madden FaraimoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cade UluaveLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Isaiah GlaskerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles13
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Jake CliftonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Maika KaufusiLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Miles HallLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Pierson WatsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adon ShulerS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return9
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Brandon LoganS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Christian GrayCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Dylahn McKinneyCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return55
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ethan LongS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jayden SandersDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles12
Current0
Relevant12
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth156
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cannon DeVriesCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Crew ClarkS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Evan JohnsonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Faletau SatualaS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Jarinn KalamaS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jayven WilliamsCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
NDNotre Dame
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Joseph VinciLS
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Spencer PorathPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards83.3
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct5
BBYU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Matthias DunnPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
111 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Notre Dame55 player profiles · 0 current
C.J. CarrQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost9
Passing Yards726
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.9
Passing Touchdowns6
Aneyas WilliamsRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards144
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.8
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards22
Matt JefferyWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards28
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions2
Armel MukamDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
Drayk BowenLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles11
Defense Sacks0
Adon ShulerS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return9
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Joseph VinciLS · Specialists
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Ja'Kobe Clapper— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
BYU56 player profiles · 0 current
Bear BachmeierQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost15
Passing Yards642
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.4
Passing Touchdowns6
Sione I MoaRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards22
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kyler KasperWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards116
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.9
Receiving Longest Reception29
Receiving Receptions9
Anisi PurcellDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Cade UluaveLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Cannon DeVriesCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Matthias DunnPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Blake Lowe— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
