A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayNorth Carolina
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 3:30 pm
HomeDuke
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
North Carolina45 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Duke43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeDUKE +8.0Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeDUKE +5.4Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context4.8 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
NCNorth Carolina
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
DDuke
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Team StrengthD · Strong edge
High84% confidence
DUKE leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 60%
The broad team read combines final results, schedule quality and bounded recent/historical context without using this game’s betting line.
Evidence: Independent projected margin: DUKE +8.0. Target-game spread, moneyline, and total are excluded from the score.
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: NORT -0.5 · DUKE -0.9.
Current FormD · Moderate edge
High78% confidence
DUKE leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 60%
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: DUKE +5.4 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
North Carolina
Outperform the overall team gapNORT does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Duke
Make the overall team edge holdDUKE owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Fresh · 5.8 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
Duke-213
North Carolina+160
Total2 sides
Over +44.5-154
Under +44.5+116
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupNorth Carolina role shape ↔ Duke secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two37.1% / 68.6%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
North Carolina has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Jordan Shipp. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Duke secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupNorth Carolina role shape ↔ Duke front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two42.3% / 74.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
North Carolina has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Benjamin Hall. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Duke front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupDuke role shape ↔ North Carolina secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two35.7% / 64.3%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Duke has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Jeremiah Hasley. Compare that involvement pattern with the available North Carolina secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupDuke role shape ↔ North Carolina front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two75.2% / 100.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Duke has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Nate Sheppard. Compare that involvement pattern with the available North Carolina front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
NCNorth Carolina
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
DDuke
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
NCRoster context only
0%
DRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
NCBuilding
59%
DBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Billy Edwards Jr.QB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost42
Passing Yards611
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.8
Passing Touchdowns3
Miles O'NeillQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards22
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg3.7
Passing Touchdowns0
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Dan MahanQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth35
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Benjamin HallRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards215
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards42
Jaylen McGillRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards86
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards20
Charleston FrenchRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards4
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts2
Demon JuneRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards115
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.6
Rushing Touchdowns4
Rushing Attempts25
Jo Jo TroupeRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards20
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts5
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
CJ CampbellRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards98
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards22
Nate SheppardRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards528
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.4
Rushing Touchdowns5
Receiving Yards62
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jelani ThurmanTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards183
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.6
Receiving Longest Reception35
Receiving Receptions11
Jordan ShippWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards164
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.6
Receiving Longest Reception23
Receiving Receptions13
Mason HumphreyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards38
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.7
Receiving Longest Reception17
Receiving Receptions3
Shamar EasterTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards23
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.5
Receiving Longest Reception14
Receiving Receptions2
Trech KekahunaWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards71
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.8
Receiving Longest Reception21
Receiving Receptions6
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth71
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jayden MooreWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
Tony BoggsTE
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Kavon SimmonsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards30
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions2
Jaivon SolomonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards51
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg25.5
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions2
Jared RichardsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards44
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.7
Receiving Longest Reception22
Receiving Receptions3
Javen NicholasWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards-1
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg-1
Receiving Longest Reception-1
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
NCNorth Carolina
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
DDuke
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Donovan HoiletteDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Emmanuel NwaiwuDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Jaylen HarveyDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack13
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles10
Leroy JacksonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles15
Melkart AbouJaoudeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack9
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
Nicco MaggioDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Dakota QuinonezDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
David AndersonDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Julius ColumbusDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Kevin O'ConnorDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack10
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Kobe SmithDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Owen WafleDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Derek McDonaldLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles24
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Jake BauerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Jonathan AgumaduLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Peyton SeelmannLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles20
Defense Unassisted Tackles14
Defense Sacks0
Timir HickmanCollinsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Asher WassermanLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Bradley GompersLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks1
Derrick Brown Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Elliott SchaperLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Kendall JohnsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Luke MergottLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ade WillieDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Coleman BrysonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Gregory Smith IIIDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions2
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Jaiden PattersonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Jalon ThompsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Javion ButtsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Andrew PellicciottaS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Che OjarikreS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
DaShawn StoneS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Dylan FlowersDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Evan SmithDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return19
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kaleb LanierCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
NCNorth Carolina
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aeron BurrellPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards57.1
Kicking Field Goals Made8
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
DDuke
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cosme SalasPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
88 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
North Carolina45 player profiles · 0 current
Billy Edwards Jr.QB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost42
Passing Yards611
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.8
Passing Touchdowns3
Benjamin HallRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards215
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards42
Jelani ThurmanTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards183
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.6
Receiving Longest Reception35
Receiving Receptions11
Donovan HoiletteDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Derek McDonaldLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles24
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Ade WillieDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Aeron BurrellPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards57.1
Kicking Field Goals Made8
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Calvin Thomas— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Duke43 player profiles · 0 current
Dan MahanQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
CJ CampbellRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards98
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards22
Jayden MooreWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
Dakota QuinonezDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Asher WassermanLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Andrew PellicciottaS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Cosme SalasPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Tyson Sanford— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
