A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayNevada
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 7:00 pm
HomeNorth Dakota State
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Nevada43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
North Dakota State52 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 4-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeNORT +13.0Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeNORT +11.3Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context5.5 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
NNevada
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
NDSNorth Dakota State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: NORT +11.3 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
NEVA has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
N lean · High confidence
2
Historical context still matters
Earlier team evidence is still materially influencing the matchup read, so uncertainty should remain higher until current-season evidence deepens.
Even lean · Medium confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Nevada
Outperform the overall team gapNEVA does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
North Dakota State
Make the overall team edge holdNORT owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupNevada role shape ↔ North Dakota State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two39.4% / 54.5%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Nevada has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Damien Moun. Compare that involvement pattern with the available North Dakota State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupNevada role shape ↔ North Dakota State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two51.9% / 87.3%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Nevada has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Dominic Kelley. Compare that involvement pattern with the available North Dakota State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupNorth Dakota State role shape ↔ Nevada secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two34.6% / 55.8%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
North Dakota State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Jackson Williams. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Nevada secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupNorth Dakota State role shape ↔ Nevada front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two64.8% / 94.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
North Dakota State has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Myles Mitchell. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Nevada front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
NNevada
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
NDSNorth Dakota State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
NRoster context only
0%
NDSRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
NBuilding
59%
NDSBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
AJ BiancoQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards116
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.8
Passing Touchdowns1
Carter JonesQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost6
Passing Yards348
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.7
Passing Touchdowns2
Luke DuncanQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards51
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg3.2
Passing Touchdowns0
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Nathan HayesQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost23
Passing Yards808
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.9
Passing Touchdowns7
Preston BrownQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost8
Passing Yards4
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg2
Passing Touchdowns0
Trey DrakeQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards35
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth61
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Herschel TurnerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards123
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.4
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards51
Ky WoodsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards39
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards10
Dominic KelleyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards281
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.9
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards21
Carter JacksonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards8
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts3
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Myles MitchellRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards214
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.7
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards15
Nyeoti PunniRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards112
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards8
Brady WavrunekRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards15
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth51
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Marshaun BrownWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards49
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.8
Receiving Longest Reception28
Receiving Receptions5
Donnie CheersWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards71
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.2
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions5
Damien MounWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards105
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.1
Receiving Longest Reception26
Receiving Receptions13
DJ AsiasiTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards32
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception17
Receiving Receptions4
Gary Givens IIIWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards121
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg30.3
Receiving Longest Reception73
Receiving Receptions4
Jaceon DossWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg18
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions1
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chris KielWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards50
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.5
Receiving Longest Reception19
Receiving Receptions4
Jackson WilliamsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards283
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.7
Receiving Longest Reception51
Receiving Receptions18
Cade OstermanWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards23
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.5
Receiving Longest Reception19
Receiving Receptions2
Dylan VokalWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards7
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions1
Isiah St. RomainWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards10
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception5
Receiving Receptions2
Jeremiah PattersonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards12
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
NNevada
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity1 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Jakobus SethOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
NDSNorth Dakota State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
David Paine Jr.DL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles6
Dylan LabarberaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles21
James GillespieDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Jason Hemphill IIDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Logologo Va'aDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Tanner VaughanDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles4
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles12
Current0
Relevant12
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth156
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Alijah WayneDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Allante BurleyDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Blake SchiltzDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Chase EvinkDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Keenan WilsonDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles10
Kelton McCaslinDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack14
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles6
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
EJ SmithLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles34
Defense Unassisted Tackles20
Defense Sacks1.5
Jack MacKinnonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Jake SilvermanLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Jeremy NaborneLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles18
Defense Unassisted Tackles11
Defense Sacks0
Myles WilliamsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1.5
Poasa UtuLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Alex ElliottLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Damian DevineLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Donovan WoolenLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles25
Defense Unassisted Tackles16
Defense Sacks0
Gavin SellLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Defense Tackles20
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks1
Jacob WrbanekLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Keith WilliamsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aiden WalkerDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Bishop TurnerS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Bryson SnellingDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Isaiah JordanDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Jaylen WebbDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Joshua ScottDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Darius GivanceS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Hudson ArtzS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jaylen ArchibaldS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jaylin CrumbyS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Kendrick CarterCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Marion MooreCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions2
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return37
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
NNevada
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Joe McFaddenPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made10
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
NDSNorth Dakota State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Drew KleinPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
95 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Nevada43 player profiles · 0 current
AJ BiancoQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards116
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.8
Passing Touchdowns1
Herschel TurnerRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards123
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.4
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards51
Marshaun BrownWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards49
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.8
Receiving Longest Reception28
Receiving Receptions5
David Paine Jr.DL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles6
EJ SmithLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles34
Defense Unassisted Tackles20
Defense Sacks1.5
Aiden WalkerDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Joe McFaddenPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made10
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Jakobus SethOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
North Dakota State52 player profiles · 0 current
Nathan HayesQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost23
Passing Yards808
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.9
Passing Touchdowns7
Myles MitchellRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards214
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.7
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards15
Chris KielWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards50
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.5
Receiving Longest Reception19
Receiving Receptions4
Alijah WayneDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Alex ElliottLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Darius GivanceS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Drew KleinPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct7
Anthony Okes— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
