A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayMississippi State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 pm
HomeLSU
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Mississippi State46 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
LSU44 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeLSU +6.9Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeLSU +9.5Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context0.6 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
MSMississippi State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
LLSU
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: LSU +9.5 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Mississippi State
Outperform the overall team gapMISS does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
LSU
Make the overall team edge holdLSU owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Fresh · 5.8 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
LSU-385
Mississippi State+270
Total2 sides
Over +56.5-175
Under +56.5+131
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupMississippi State role shape ↔ LSU secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two43.5% / 65.2%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Mississippi State has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Anthony Evans III. Compare that involvement pattern with the available LSU secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupMississippi State role shape ↔ LSU front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two67.6% / 91.5%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Mississippi State has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Fluff Bothwell. Compare that involvement pattern with the available LSU front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupLSU role shape ↔ Mississippi State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two27.8% / 53.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
LSU has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Winston Watkins. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Mississippi State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupLSU role shape ↔ Mississippi State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two72.7% / 89.8%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
LSU has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Dilin Jones. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Mississippi State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
MSMississippi State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
LLSU
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
MSRoster context only
0%
LRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
MSBuilding
59%
LBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Kamario TaylorQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost19
Passing Yards832
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.1
Passing Touchdowns11
Parker PuckettQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards63
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.9
Passing Touchdowns0
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth61
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Sam LeavittQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost36
Passing Yards732
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.9
Passing Touchdowns3
Husan LongstreetQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards33
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg33
Passing Touchdowns0
Landen ClarkQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards109
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.9
Passing Touchdowns1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth38
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brinston WilliamsRB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Fluff BothwellRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards280
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.8
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards41
Kolin WilsonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards89
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards29
Xavier GaytenRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards41
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.8
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts6
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Seth KnotheRB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Dilin JonesRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards285
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards21
Stacy GageRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards56
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards10
Caden DurhamRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards1
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg0.3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts4
Harlem BerryRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards13
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth59
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Gracen HarrisWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards21
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.5
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions2
Amaree WilliamsTE
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Anthony Evans IIIWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards294
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.7
Receiving Longest Reception39
Receiving Receptions20
Riley WilliamsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards16
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions2
Sam WestTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards30
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.5
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions4
Sanfrisco MageeWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards132
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.2
Receiving Longest Reception30
Receiving Receptions10
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth68
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Malik ElzyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards6
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions1
Eugene WilsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards132
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception53
Receiving Receptions12
Phillip Wright IIIWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards70
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg23.3
Receiving Longest Reception33
Receiving Receptions3
Trey'Dez GreenTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards222
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.9
Receiving Longest Reception24
Receiving Receptions14
Winston WatkinsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards207
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.8
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions15
Jackson HarrisWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards117
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg23.4
Receiving Longest Reception42
Receiving Receptions5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
MSMississippi State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
LLSU
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity1 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Jordan SeatonOT
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Darron Reed Jr.DL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Dealyn EvansDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Jaray BledsoeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack8
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Jayson JenkinsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles7
Kalvin DinkinsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Will WhitsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles12
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Dominick McKinleyDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Dylan CarpenterDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Jordan RossDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack12
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles9
Junior TuihalamakaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Kolaj CobbinsDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Malik BloctonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
AJ RiceLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Derion GulletteLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Fred ClarkLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Jalen SmithLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles20
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
LaKendrick JamesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Tyler LockhartLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks1
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Charles Ross IILB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Davhon KeysLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
TJ DotteryLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles9
Defense Sacks0
Whit WeeksLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles20
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Zach WeeksLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Amarien JeffersonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Isaac SmithS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Jameer GrimsleyDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jardin GilbertS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Jatavious JohnsonS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Kaylib SingletonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
CJ JimcoilyS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Dashawn SpearsS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
DJ PickettCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return32
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Faheem DelaneS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Ja'Keem JacksonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return10
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jhase ThomasS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
MSMississippi State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Kyle FerriePK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards83.3
Kicking Field Goals Made18
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct5
LLSU
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Scott StarzykPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards83.3
Kicking Field Goals Made13
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
90 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Mississippi State46 player profiles · 0 current
Kamario TaylorQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost19
Passing Yards832
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.1
Passing Touchdowns11
Brinston WilliamsRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Gracen HarrisWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards21
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.5
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions2
Darron Reed Jr.DL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
AJ RiceLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Amarien JeffersonCB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Kyle FerriePK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards83.3
Kicking Field Goals Made18
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct5
Bralan Womack— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
LSU44 player profiles · 0 current
Sam LeavittQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost36
Passing Yards732
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.9
Passing Touchdowns3
Seth KnotheRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Malik ElzyWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards6
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions1
Dominick McKinleyDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Charles Ross IILB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
CJ JimcoilyS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Scott StarzykPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards83.3
Kicking Field Goals Made13
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct5
Jordan SeatonOT · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
