A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayLouisiana Tech
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 8:00 pm
HomeUL Monroe
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Louisiana Tech60 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
UL Monroe44 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeLOUI +10.6Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeLOUI +10.7Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context3.0 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
LTLouisiana Tech
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
UMUL Monroe
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: LOUI +10.7 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Louisiana Tech
Make the overall team edge holdLOUI owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
UL Monroe
Outperform the overall team gapULMO does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupLouisiana Tech role shape ↔ UL Monroe secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two30.4% / 58.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Louisiana Tech has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Eli Finley. Compare that involvement pattern with the available UL Monroe secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupLouisiana Tech role shape ↔ UL Monroe front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two55.9% / 82.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Louisiana Tech has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Andrew Burnette. Compare that involvement pattern with the available UL Monroe front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupUL Monroe role shape ↔ Louisiana Tech secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two28.0% / 56.0%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
UL Monroe has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Bryce Anderson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Louisiana Tech secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupUL Monroe role shape ↔ Louisiana Tech front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two100.0% / 100.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
UL Monroe has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Derrick Jameson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Louisiana Tech front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
LTLouisiana Tech
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
UMUL Monroe
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
BackfieldLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
ReceiversLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
LTRoster context only
0%
UMRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
LinebackersLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
SecondaryLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
SpecialistsLimited context
LTBuilding
59%
UMBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Blake BakerQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost39
Passing Yards360
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.3
Passing Touchdowns4
Jackson BradleyQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards3
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg1
Passing Touchdowns0
Trey KukukQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards283
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.5
Passing Touchdowns3
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aidan ArmentaQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost10
Passing Yards215
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.8
Passing Touchdowns1
Austin CarlisleQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost39
Passing Yards312
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.9
Passing Touchdowns3
Landon GravesQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Andrew BurnetteRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards68
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards-1
Dylone BrooksRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards50
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards16
Sergio SniderRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards17
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.8
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts6
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth10
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Derrick JamesonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards117
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.2
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards61
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth68
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
David PierroWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards3
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg3
Receiving Longest Reception3
Receiving Receptions1
Jalen MickensWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards297
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg22.8
Receiving Longest Reception75
Receiving Receptions13
Talyn ShettronWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards80
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.4
Receiving Longest Reception16
Receiving Receptions7
Brayden BocklerTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards7
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg3.5
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions2
Dedrick LatulasWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards10
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions2
Eli FinleyTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards132
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.4
Receiving Longest Reception29
Receiving Receptions14
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth74
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bryce AndersonTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards53
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.6
Receiving Longest Reception16
Receiving Receptions7
Nic TrujilloWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards84
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14
Receiving Longest Reception47
Receiving Receptions6
Parker FulghumWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards96
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.7
Receiving Longest Reception31
Receiving Receptions7
Brandon BuckhaulterWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards14
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions2
JP CoulterWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards29
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.7
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
LTLouisiana Tech
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth26
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity2 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Hayden ChristmanOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Will HutchensOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
UMUL Monroe
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daylin PageDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Donovan RiemanDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Jacob BradfordDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Jojo OdomDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Judd RouyeaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Lane CondryDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack12
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth52
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
CJ Wilson Jr.DL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Derek OmoregieDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
James SmithDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles7
Kevontay WellsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack5
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth115
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Alonzo Jackson Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles27
Defense Unassisted Tackles16
Defense Sacks3
Cole WatsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Colton DeckardLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Jadon MayfieldLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles18
Defense Unassisted Tackles9
Defense Sacks1
Jaylon ParnellLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Kolbe FieldsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks1
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Billy PullenLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Jaeden CalenderLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Kelbee HolmesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Marcus RossLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles16
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Noah FlemmingsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles25
Defense Unassisted Tackles15
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ahkhari JohnsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Amari ButlerDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Demario BookhartDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jacoryian CroweDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Javari LockhartDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jordan McRaeDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return100
Defense Assisted Tackles8
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ameyr AdamsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Armoni RueCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Carl Fauntroy Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return16
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Jabari TillerDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Jay HarperDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Korian WilsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
LTLouisiana Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth27
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ean BurchLS
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Hunter RiouxPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made1
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct1
Kaegan KentPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made13
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
UMUL Monroe
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Abram MurrayPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts85.7
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made7
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
104 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Louisiana Tech60 player profiles · 0 current
Blake BakerQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost39
Passing Yards360
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg10.3
Passing Touchdowns4
Andrew BurnetteRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards68
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards-1
David PierroWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards3
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg3
Receiving Longest Reception3
Receiving Receptions1
Daylin PageDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Alonzo Jackson Jr.LB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles27
Defense Unassisted Tackles16
Defense Sacks3
Ahkhari JohnsonDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ean BurchLS · Specialists
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Hayden ChristmanOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
UL Monroe44 player profiles · 0 current
Aidan ArmentaQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost10
Passing Yards215
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.8
Passing Touchdowns1
Derrick JamesonRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards117
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.2
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards61
Bryce AndersonTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards53
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.6
Receiving Longest Reception16
Receiving Receptions7
CJ Wilson Jr.DL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Billy PullenLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Ameyr AdamsDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Abram MurrayPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts85.7
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made7
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
CJ Phillip— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
