A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayGeorgia Tech
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 3:30 pm
HomeVirginia Tech
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Georgia Tech43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Virginia Tech60 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeVIRG +0.7Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeVIRG +11.3Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context10.4 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
GTGeorgia Tech
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
VTVirginia Tech
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: VIRG +11.3 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
Current form and the broader team read disagree
The current-season read (VIRG +11.3) is materially different from the broader team read (VIRG +0.7), increasing uncertainty around which signal will hold.
Even lean · Medium confidence
2
Historical context still matters
Earlier team evidence is still materially influencing the matchup read, so uncertainty should remain higher until current-season evidence deepens.
Even lean · Medium confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Georgia Tech
Outperform the overall team gapGEOR does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Virginia Tech
Outperform the overall team gapVIRG does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupGeorgia Tech role shape ↔ Virginia Tech secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two41.2% / 76.5%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Georgia Tech has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Jordan Allen. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Virginia Tech secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupGeorgia Tech role shape ↔ Virginia Tech front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two65.5% / 84.5%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Georgia Tech has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Justice Haynes. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Virginia Tech front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupVirginia Tech role shape ↔ Georgia Tech secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two36.2% / 62.3%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Virginia Tech has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Luke Reynolds. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Georgia Tech secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupVirginia Tech role shape ↔ Georgia Tech front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two48.1% / 91.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Virginia Tech has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Marcellous Hawkins. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Georgia Tech front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
GTGeorgia Tech
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
VTVirginia Tech
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
GTRoster context only
0%
VTRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
GTBuilding
59%
VTBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Alberto MendozaQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost57
Passing Yards707
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.4
Passing Touchdowns4
Grady AdamsonQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth42
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bryce BakerQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost8
Passing Yards127
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.1
Passing Touchdowns1
Ethan GrunkemeyerQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost35
Passing Yards865
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.6
Passing Touchdowns7
A.J. BrandQB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards10
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception5
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth30
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Justice HaynesRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards286
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards66
Trelain MaddoxRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards38
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards31
Chad AlexanderRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards8
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts4
Malachi HosleyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards61
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts16
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Tyler MasonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards16
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jeffrey Overton Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards200
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.7
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards95
Marcellous HawkinsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards187
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.8
Rushing Touchdowns4
Receiving Yards33
John BuetowRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards19
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg9.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth66
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jordan AllenWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards149
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.6
Receiving Longest Reception30
Receiving Receptions14
Jaylen MbakweWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Chris CorboTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards27
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions3
Debron GatlingWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards33
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg33
Receiving Longest Reception33
Receiving Receptions1
Gavin HarrisTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards5
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception5
Receiving Receptions1
Isaiah FuhrmannWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards29
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.5
Receiving Longest Reception19
Receiving Receptions2
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth55
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Luke ReynoldsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards265
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.6
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions25
Tyseer DenmarkWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards59
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.8
Receiving Longest Reception19
Receiving Receptions5
Ayden GreeneWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards125
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.6
Receiving Longest Reception44
Receiving Receptions8
Benji GosnellTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards15
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions3
Chanz WigginsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards40
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg40
Receiving Longest Reception40
Receiving Receptions1
Harrison Saint GermainTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards15
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
GTGeorgia Tech
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
VTVirginia Tech
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
A.J. HofflerDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Amontrae BradfordDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Brayden ManleyDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Jordan BoydDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Jordan WalkerDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Landen MarshallDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster16
Player profiles16
Current0
Relevant16
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth208
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aycen StevensDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack20
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles8
Christian EvansDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Cortez HarrisDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3
Defense Yards Lost On Sack26
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Daniel JenningsDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Deric DandyDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Elhadj FallDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles8
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cayman SpauldingLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
E.J. LightseyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles20
Defense Unassisted Tackles9
Defense Sacks0
Kyle EffordLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles13
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks1
Melvin Jordan IVLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Noah CarterLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks1
Taje MccoyLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles13
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks1
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth96
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Antwone SantiagoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Brett ClatterbaughLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Curtis Jones Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
George BallanceLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Kaleb SpencerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks3
Keon WylieLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth83
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daiquan WhiteDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jon MitchellDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jonas DuclonaCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Kelvin HillDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Savion RileyDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Zachary TobeDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster12
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brennan JohnsonS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Isaiah BrownMurrayCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jaquez WhiteCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Joshua ClarkeCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kenny Woseley Jr.CB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Knahlij HarrellCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
GTGeorgia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aidan BirrPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts90
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made10
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
VTVirginia Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
John LovePK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts94.7
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made19
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
103 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Georgia Tech43 player profiles · 0 current
Alberto MendozaQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost57
Passing Yards707
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.4
Passing Touchdowns4
Justice HaynesRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards286
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards66
Jordan AllenWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards149
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.6
Receiving Longest Reception30
Receiving Receptions14
A.J. HofflerDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Cayman SpauldingLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Daiquan WhiteDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Aidan BirrPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts90
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made10
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Amier Clarke— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Virginia Tech60 player profiles · 0 current
Bryce BakerQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost8
Passing Yards127
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.1
Passing Touchdowns1
Tyler MasonRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards16
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Luke ReynoldsTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards265
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.6
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions25
Aycen StevensDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack20
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles8
Antwone SantiagoLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Brennan JohnsonS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
John LovePK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts94.7
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made19
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Tyson Harley— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
