A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayFlorida State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 7:00 pm
HomeMiami
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Florida State36 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Miami58 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeMIAM +14.1Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeMIAM +19.7Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context1.6 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
FSFlorida State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
MMiami
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: MIAM +19.7 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
MIAM has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
M lean · High confidence
2
Current form and the broader team read disagree
The current-season read (MIAM +19.7) is materially different from the broader team read (MIAM +14.1), increasing uncertainty around which signal will hold.
Even lean · Medium confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Florida State
Outperform the overall team gapFLOR does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Miami
Make the overall team edge holdMIAM owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupFlorida State role shape ↔ Miami secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two37.9% / 69.0%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Florida State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Duce Robinson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Miami secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupFlorida State role shape ↔ Miami front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two67.9% / 93.6%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Florida State has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Ousmane Kromah. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Miami front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupMiami role shape ↔ Florida State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two43.1% / 58.5%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Miami has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Malachi Toney. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Florida State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupMiami role shape ↔ Florida State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two48.0% / 66.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Miami has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Mark Fletcher Jr.. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Florida State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
FSFlorida State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
MMiami
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
FSRoster context only
0%
MRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
FSBuilding
59%
MBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ashton DanielsQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost48
Passing Yards704
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.9
Passing Touchdowns4
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Darian MensahQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost1
Passing Yards873
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg11.1
Passing Touchdowns11
Luke NickelQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards171
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg13.2
Passing Touchdowns3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth56
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ousmane KromahRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards311
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.9
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards22
Samuel SingletonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards73
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards162
Tre WisnerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards34
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards4
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth40
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
CharMar BrownRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards97
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards12
Girard Pringle Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards38
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards45
Mark Fletcher Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards230
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.4
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards10
Jack WhitehouseRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards57
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg11.4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts5
Terrell Walden IIRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards25
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Chase LoftinTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards8
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions1
Micahi DanzyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards158
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.6
Receiving Longest Reception56
Receiving Receptions9
Desirrio RilesTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards9
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4.5
Receiving Longest Reception6
Receiving Receptions2
Duce RobinsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards210
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.1
Receiving Longest Reception40
Receiving Receptions11
Jayvan BoggsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards118
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.7
Receiving Longest Reception35
Receiving Receptions6
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth53
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daylyn UpshawWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards59
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.4
Receiving Longest Reception14
Receiving Receptions8
Brennan BurtonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards5
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception5
Receiving Receptions1
Cooper BarkateWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards96
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.6
Receiving Longest Reception34
Receiving Receptions10
Elija LoftonTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards62
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.9
Receiving Longest Reception21
Receiving Receptions7
Joshua MooreWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards107
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.3
Receiving Longest Reception55
Receiving Receptions7
Malachi ToneyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards444
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.9
Receiving Longest Reception52
Receiving Receptions28
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
FSFlorida State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity2 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Xavier ChaplinOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
MMiami
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daniel LyonsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
Darryll DesirDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Deamontae DiggsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Deante McCrayDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Jordan SandersDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Kevin WynnDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ahmad MotenDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Armondo BlountDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles9
Booker PickettDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Herbert Scroggins IIIDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Jarquez CarterDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Justin ScottDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
A.J. CottrillLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Blake NichelsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Caleb LavalleeLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Mikai GbayorLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1
Omar Graham Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles16
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth83
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Kellen Wiley Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Cam PruittLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Chase SmithLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Ezekiel Marcelin Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Kamal BonnerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Mohamed ToureLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Antonio Cromartie Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ashlynd BarkerDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Charles Lester IIIDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
CJ Richard Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Ja'Bril RawlsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Ma'Khi JonesS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bryce FitzgeraldDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Chris Ewald Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Damari BrownDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Ethan O'ConnorDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Isaiah TaylorDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
OJ Frederique Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
FSFlorida State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Gabe PanikowskiPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
MMiami
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth21
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jack OlsenPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made1
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Jake WeinbergPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Will RochaPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made5
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
94 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Florida State36 player profiles · 0 current
Ashton DanielsQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost48
Passing Yards704
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.9
Passing Touchdowns4
Ousmane KromahRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards311
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.9
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards22
Chase LoftinTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards8
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions1
Daniel LyonsDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
A.J. CottrillLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Antonio Cromartie Jr.DB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Gabe PanikowskiPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Xavier ChaplinOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Miami58 player profiles · 0 current
Darian MensahQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost1
Passing Yards873
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg11.1
Passing Touchdowns11
CharMar BrownRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards97
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards12
Daylyn UpshawWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards59
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.4
Receiving Longest Reception14
Receiving Receptions8
Ahmad MotenDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack2
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Kellen Wiley Jr.LB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Bryce FitzgeraldDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jack OlsenPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made1
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Dereon Coleman— · Other
Earlier data
Passing Attempts6
Passing Completion Pct83.3
Passing Completions5
Passing Interceptions0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
