A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayFlorida International
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 13, 2026 · 8:00 pm
HomeJacksonville State
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Florida International41 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Jacksonville State50 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 4-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeJACK +2.3Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeJACK +1.3Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context1.7 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
FIFlorida International
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
JSJacksonville State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Team StrengthJS · Slight edge
High84% confidence
JACK leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 73%
The broad team read combines final results, schedule quality and bounded recent/historical context without using this game’s betting line.
Evidence: Independent projected margin: JACK +2.3. Target-game spread, moneyline, and total are excluded from the score.
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: FLOR -3.0 · JACK -4.6.
Current FormJS · Even
High78% confidence
JACK leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 73%
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: JACK +1.3 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Florida International
Outperform the overall team gapFLOR does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Jacksonville State
Make the overall team edge holdJACK owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupFlorida International role shape ↔ Jacksonville State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two33.9% / 54.8%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Florida International has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Maguire Anderson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Jacksonville State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupFlorida International role shape ↔ Jacksonville State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two54.5% / 88.3%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Florida International has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Anthony Carrie. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Jacksonville State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupJacksonville State role shape ↔ Florida International secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two25.0% / 47.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Jacksonville State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Deondre Johnson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Florida International secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupJacksonville State role shape ↔ Florida International front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two46.8% / 74.5%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Jacksonville State has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Jalen Likely. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Florida International front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
FIFlorida International
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
JSJacksonville State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
FIRoster context only
0%
JSRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
FIBuilding
59%
JSBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth31
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
J.J. KohlQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost9
Passing Yards930
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.2
Passing Touchdowns4
James ResarQB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards17
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg17
Receiving Longest Reception21
Receiving Receptions6
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth45
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Caden CreelQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost13
Passing Yards871
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns8
Jack MoranQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards25
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg12.5
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Anthony CarrieRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards124
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards31
Sterling JosephRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards26
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.9
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards1
Devonte LyonsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards81
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.1
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts26
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth30
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jalen LikelyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards129
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.9
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards35
Khristian LandoRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards46
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards22
Lucas FarringtonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards66
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards48
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth139
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
JoJo StoneWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards183
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.1
Receiving Longest Reception68
Receiving Receptions13
Maguire AndersonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards324
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.4
Receiving Longest Reception44
Receiving Receptions21
Eric NelsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards96
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16
Receiving Longest Reception36
Receiving Receptions6
Greg Gaines IIIWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards37
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception21
Receiving Receptions4
Jackson VerdugoTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards28
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception15
Receiving Receptions3
Tyson CarterWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards99
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.1
Receiving Longest Reception29
Receiving Receptions7
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth40
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Darius CannonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards93
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception38
Receiving Receptions10
David AlpersTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards40
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.3
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions3
Deondre JohnsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards169
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.4
Receiving Longest Reception42
Receiving Receptions11
Dylan GentryWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards14
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions2
Franklin Baret Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg18
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions1
Jameson ScissumTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards13
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6.5
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
FIFlorida International
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
JSJacksonville State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Anthony Cunningham Jr.DE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Anthony SmithDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
DeeJay Holmes Jr.DE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3
Defense Yards Lost On Sack22
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles9
Elijah SimmonsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Germaine CarterDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Kani SmithDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Andrew RumphDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Christopher JohnsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Jawaun CampbellDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles14
Khurtiss PerryDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles11
Marquis HoodDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles12
McCade WrightDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brayshawn LittlejohnLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
JaCorey StewartLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles15
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Josiah TaylorLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles13
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Orlando SyphTimmonsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Percy Courtney Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth109
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Angel ToombsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Aidan ThompsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0.5
Ian MitchellLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks1
Jacob CruzLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles16
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks1
Mikey RosaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Morven JosephLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles13
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Demetrius HillDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
JaiAyviauynn CelestineDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return24
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Lawrence JohnsonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Myles CunninghamCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ormond WallaceDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ryan GadsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Caleb NixS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return43
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Jaheim JenkinsCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
JQ BrooksCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Kaden CookDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Marc WoodsS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Riggs DunnS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
FIFlorida International
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Robert CzeremchaPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts80
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made5
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
JSJacksonville State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample4 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample4 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Garrison RippaPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards60
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
91 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Florida International41 player profiles · 0 current
J.J. KohlQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost9
Passing Yards930
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.2
Passing Touchdowns4
Anthony CarrieRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards124
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards31
JoJo StoneWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards183
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.1
Receiving Longest Reception68
Receiving Receptions13
Anthony Cunningham Jr.DE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
Brayshawn LittlejohnLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Demetrius HillDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Robert CzeremchaPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts80
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made5
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Deandre Arnold— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Jacksonville State50 player profiles · 0 current
Caden CreelQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost13
Passing Yards871
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns8
Jalen LikelyRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards129
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.9
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards35
Darius CannonWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards93
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception38
Receiving Receptions10
Andrew RumphDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Angel ToombsLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Caleb NixS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return43
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Garrison RippaPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards60
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Rodarion Jones— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
