A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayDelaware
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 13, 2026 · 7:00 pm
HomeMiddle Tennessee
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Delaware48 player profiles
Evidence coverage 53.4% · based on a 3-game team sample
Middle Tennessee39 player profiles
Evidence coverage 53.4% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeDELA +1.3Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeMIDD +2.0Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context3.7 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
DDelaware
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
MTMiddle Tennessee
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Team StrengthD · Even
High84% confidence
DELA leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 100%
The broad team read combines final results, schedule quality and bounded recent/historical context without using this game’s betting line.
Evidence: Independent projected margin: DELA +1.3. Target-game spread, moneyline, and total are excluded from the score.
Schedule StrengthD · Moderate edge
High77% confidence
DELA leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 100%
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: DELA -2.6 · MIDD -4.9.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: MIDD +2.0 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
DELA has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
D lean · High confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Delaware
Outperform the overall team gapDELA does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Middle Tennessee
Outperform the overall team gapMIDD does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupDelaware role shape ↔ Middle Tennessee secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two34.6% / 59.6%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Delaware has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Sean Wilson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Middle Tennessee secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupDelaware role shape ↔ Middle Tennessee front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two51.6% / 75.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Delaware has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Jo'Nathan Silver. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Middle Tennessee front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupMiddle Tennessee role shape ↔ Delaware secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two54.8% / 71.4%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Middle Tennessee has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Cam'Ron Lacy. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Delaware secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupMiddle Tennessee role shape ↔ Delaware front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two82.5% / 94.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Middle Tennessee has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Antonio Martin. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Delaware front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
DDelaware
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
MTMiddle Tennessee
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
DBuilding
59%
MTBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
DBuilding
59%
MTBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
DBuilding
59%
MTBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
DRoster context only
0%
MTRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
DBuilding
59%
MTBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
DBuilding
59%
MTBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
DBuilding
59%
MTBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
DBuilding
20%
MTBuilding
20%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth32
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Braden StreeterQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost18
Passing Yards88
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.3
Passing Touchdowns0
Nick MinicucciQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost48
Passing Yards814
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.6
Passing Touchdowns5
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth16
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Roman GaglianoQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost11
Passing Yards616
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6
Passing Touchdowns6
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth64
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Viron Ellison Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards49
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards8
Jo'Nathan SilverRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards156
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards10
Kaderris RobertsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards54
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards132
Greg SpillerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards6
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts1
Jared PorterRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards7
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts1
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth38
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Austin ClemonsRB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Antonio MartinRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards239
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.1
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards19
DJ TaylorRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards25
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards11
Brooklen DavisRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards20
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth84
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Da'Wain LoftonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards258
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.8
Receiving Longest Reception57
Receiving Receptions13
Elijah SessomsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards49
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16.3
Receiving Longest Reception27
Receiving Receptions3
Matt McKinleyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards33
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg33
Receiving Longest Reception33
Receiving Receptions1
Bryson GravesWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards71
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.9
Receiving Longest Reception37
Receiving Receptions8
Donovan LewisWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards52
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.4
Receiving Longest Reception31
Receiving Receptions5
Jackson WhitacreTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg18
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions1
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Evan PoticherTE
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Cam'Ron LacyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards222
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.7
Receiving Longest Reception24
Receiving Receptions23
Hogan WassonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards24
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8
Receiving Longest Reception13
Receiving Receptions3
Markus AllenWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards108
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.4
Receiving Longest Reception41
Receiving Receptions7
Neo CliftonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards75
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.5
Receiving Longest Reception27
Receiving Receptions6
Santana FlemingWR
Earlier data
Rushing Attempts1
Rushing Longest Rush7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Yards7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
DDelaware
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
MTMiddle Tennessee
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brandon GorhamDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles8
Dominick BrognaDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles6
James SteelDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Kaeden SingletonDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Nate RayDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Noah MatthewsDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2
Defense Yards Lost On Sack18
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles7
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aidan ButtsDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Archie Roseman VNT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Felix HixonNT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles8
Justin BodfordDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
Kaven CallDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles9
Zeion SimpsonSmithDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles14
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Blake MatthewsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks2.5
Colin GallagherLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks2
Gavin MoulLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles16
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
Jawarren CorbinLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Julius PuryearLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ashton TaylorLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks0
Jaiyden ThompsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Jayson LoweLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles5
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
Korey SmithLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles14
Defense Tackles26
Defense Unassisted Tackles12
Defense Sacks0
Reggie JohnsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
AJ GrahamS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
George MullinsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Jamarion KolagbodiCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jaquise AlexanderCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kahlil AliS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Kshawn Cox Jr.CB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Aidan SingletonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Camari HallCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jackson LoweCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
James JohnsonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Jordan ChestnutCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Kalen WoodsS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
DDelaware
Building
Data coverage20%
Roster1
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage20% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
MTMiddle Tennessee
Building
Data coverage20%
Roster1
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage20% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
87 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Delaware48 player profiles · 0 current
Braden StreeterQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost18
Passing Yards88
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.3
Passing Touchdowns0
Viron Ellison Jr.RB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards49
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards8
Da'Wain LoftonWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards258
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.8
Receiving Longest Reception57
Receiving Receptions13
Brandon GorhamDE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles8
Blake MatthewsLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks2.5
AJ GrahamS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Christian Corbin— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Nick MinicucciQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost48
Passing Yards814
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.6
Passing Touchdowns5
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Middle Tennessee39 player profiles · 0 current
Roman GaglianoQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost11
Passing Yards616
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6
Passing Touchdowns6
Austin ClemonsRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Evan PoticherTE · Receivers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Aidan ButtsDE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Ashton TaylorLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks0
Aidan SingletonDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Bryce Williams— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Antonio MartinRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards239
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.1
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards19
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
