A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayCincinnati
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 12:00 pm
HomeWest Virginia
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Cincinnati48 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
West Virginia46 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeCINC +3.0Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeWEST +0.5Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context4.3 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
CCincinnati
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
WVWest Virginia
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Team StrengthC · Slight edge
High84% confidence
CINC leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 100%
The broad team read combines final results, schedule quality and bounded recent/historical context without using this game’s betting line.
Evidence: Independent projected margin: CINC +3.0. Target-game spread, moneyline, and total are excluded from the score.
Schedule StrengthWV · Slight edge
High77% confidence
WEST leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 100%
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: CINC +1.5 · WEST +3.2.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: WEST +0.5 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Cincinnati
Make the overall team edge holdCINC owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
West Virginia
Outperform the overall team gapWEST does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupCincinnati role shape ↔ West Virginia secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two29.1% / 54.5%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Cincinnati has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by JaVonnie Gibson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available West Virginia secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupCincinnati role shape ↔ West Virginia front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two46.1% / 68.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Cincinnati has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Gi'Bran Payne. Compare that involvement pattern with the available West Virginia front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupWest Virginia role shape ↔ Cincinnati secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two34.8% / 60.9%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
West Virginia has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by DJ Epps. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Cincinnati secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupWest Virginia role shape ↔ Cincinnati front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two90.9% / 100.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
West Virginia has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Cam Cook. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Cincinnati front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
CCincinnati
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
WVWest Virginia
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
CRoster context only
0%
WVRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
CBuilding
59%
WVBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
JC FrenchQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost21
Passing Yards631
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.8
Passing Touchdowns5
Liam O'BrienQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards18
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg3.6
Passing Touchdowns0
Samaj JonesQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards9
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4.5
Passing Touchdowns0
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth37
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Michael Hawkins Jr.QB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost16
Passing Yards477
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg12.6
Passing Touchdowns5
Scotty Fox Jr.QB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards27
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg6.8
Passing Touchdowns0
Max AndersonQB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards7
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg7
Rushing Attempts1
Rushing Longest Rush7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth40
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cole TabbRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards187
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg11
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards43
Gi'Bran PayneRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards242
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.9
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards21
Zion JohnsonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards49
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.1
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards11
Cade WolfordRB
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4.5
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions4
Zylan PerryRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards97
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.1
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts12
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth15
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cam CookRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards317
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards16
Darius MorantRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards11
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg1.6
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts7
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth61
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Malachi HenryWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards95
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg23.8
Receiving Longest Reception56
Receiving Receptions4
Devyn ZahurskyTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards9
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9
Receiving Longest Reception9
Receiving Receptions1
Elijah JonesWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards5
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5
Receiving Longest Reception5
Receiving Receptions1
Gavin GroverTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards79
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.3
Receiving Longest Reception29
Receiving Receptions7
Giyahni KontosisWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards23
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7.7
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions3
Isaiah JohnsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards76
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5.4
Receiving Longest Reception15
Receiving Receptions14
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth50
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Armoni WeaverWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards67
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg22.3
Receiving Longest Reception49
Receiving Receptions3
DJ EppsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards240
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg30
Receiving Longest Reception59
Receiving Receptions8
Jaden BrayWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards96
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg16
Receiving Longest Reception38
Receiving Receptions6
Cyrus TraughWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
John NeiderWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards37
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception17
Receiving Receptions4
Ryan WardTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards32
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg32
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
CCincinnati
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
WVWest Virginia
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cameron RoetherfordDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Chidera OtutuDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Drew LoganDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Jaylon WhiteMcClainDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Josh HoughDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack18
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles10
Marquaze ParkerDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack1
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth65
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Corey Mcintyre Jr.DL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Ezekiel DurhamCampbellDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Harper HollomanDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Nate GabrielDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack7
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles10
Taylor BrownDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Brian Simms IIILB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Damaine WilsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Filip MaciorowskiLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0.5
Jonathan ThompsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles12
Defense Sacks2.5
Montay WeedonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Patrick BauerLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles7
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks0
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ashton WoodsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles9
Defense Sacks2
Ben CutterLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Cam TorborLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
David AfoghoLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks1
Isaiah PattersonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles13
Defense Tackles26
Defense Unassisted Tackles13
Defense Sacks1
Jason HallLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster13
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Antwan Peek Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles9
CJ CriteDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
D'Angelo HutchinsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Daniel JamesCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Jacob FinleyCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Jasper BeelerS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Andrew PowdrellDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
ChaMarryus BomarCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Chams DiagneCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Geimere LatimerCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Jaire RawlisonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Kamari WilsonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
CCincinnati
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Stephen RusnakPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
WVWest Virginia
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth14
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jack CassidyPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Nate FlowerPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made1
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
94 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Cincinnati48 player profiles · 0 current
JC FrenchQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost21
Passing Yards631
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg7.8
Passing Touchdowns5
Cole TabbRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards187
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg11
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards43
Malachi HenryWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards95
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg23.8
Receiving Longest Reception56
Receiving Receptions4
Cameron RoetherfordDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Brian Simms IIILB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Antwan Peek Jr.DB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Stephen RusnakPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Jonathan Rulo— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
West Virginia46 player profiles · 0 current
Michael Hawkins Jr.QB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost16
Passing Yards477
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg12.6
Passing Touchdowns5
Cam CookRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards317
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards16
Armoni WeaverWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards67
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg22.3
Receiving Longest Reception49
Receiving Receptions3
Corey Mcintyre Jr.DL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles8
Ashton WoodsLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles14
Defense Unassisted Tackles9
Defense Sacks2
Andrew PowdrellDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Jack CassidyPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Da'Mare Williams— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
