A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayArkansas State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 7:00 pm
HomeSouthern Miss
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Arkansas State43 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Southern Miss60 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeSOUT +1.6Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeARKA +2.7Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context4.8 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
ASArkansas State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
SMSouthern Miss
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Compares the quality of opponents each side has faced so schedule difficulty is visible alongside the overall team read.
Evidence: Opponent-adjusted schedule rating: ARKA -3.3 · SOUT -1.7.
Current FormAS · Slight edge
High78% confidence
ARKA leanEvidence depth: Current-season · Historical weight: 100%
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: ARKA +2.7 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Arkansas State
Outperform the overall team gapARKA does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Southern Miss
Outperform the overall team gapSOUT does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupArkansas State role shape ↔ Southern Miss secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two38.2% / 64.7%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Arkansas State has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Chauncy Cobb. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Southern Miss secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupArkansas State role shape ↔ Southern Miss front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two55.1% / 83.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Arkansas State has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Kenyon Clay. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Southern Miss front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupSouthern Miss role shape ↔ Arkansas State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two31.4% / 52.9%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Southern Miss has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Mario Sanders II. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Arkansas State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupSouthern Miss role shape ↔ Arkansas State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two62.2% / 78.4%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Southern Miss has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Jamarice Wilder. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Arkansas State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
ASArkansas State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
SMSouthern Miss
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
ASRoster context only
0%
SMRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
SMBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth21
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Trey OwensQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost44
Passing Yards593
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.4
Passing Touchdowns3
Drew DickeyQB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards4
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4
Rushing Attempts1
Rushing Longest Rush4
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth48
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ethan HamptonQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost8
Passing Yards419
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.6
Passing Touchdowns2
John WhiteQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
Landry LyddyQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost13
Passing Yards265
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8
Passing Touchdowns1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Ezell JollyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards74
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards11
Kenyon ClayRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards104
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.9
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards89
Timothy CarterRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards17
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.1
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts8
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth25
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jamarice WilderRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards120
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards-2
Jaylen FosterRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards31
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts6
Robert BriggsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards22
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg11
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts2
Robert HendersonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards16
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg2.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts6
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth66
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Hunter SummersWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards154
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.1
Receiving Longest Reception40
Receiving Receptions9
Reed LinderWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Chauncy CobbWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards141
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.8
Receiving Longest Reception28
Receiving Receptions13
Jabari BushTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards61
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg20.3
Receiving Longest Reception46
Receiving Receptions3
Jaylen BonelliWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards94
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg15.7
Receiving Longest Reception30
Receiving Receptions6
Joshua BurrellTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards18
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions2
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth58
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Jeremiah DillonWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
MJ JohnsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards103
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.7
Receiving Longest Reception43
Receiving Receptions7
A.J. LittleWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards101
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.2
Receiving Longest Reception35
Receiving Receptions11
Davis DaltonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards17
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.5
Receiving Longest Reception10
Receiving Receptions2
Grant PageWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards52
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg10.4
Receiving Longest Reception33
Receiving Receptions5
Jeremiah Beck Jr.TE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards31
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg6.2
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
ASArkansas State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
SMSouthern Miss
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Donquarius ParkerDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Elias ShermanDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles12
Defense Tackles19
Ryan ReeseDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles11
Shakai WoodsDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Shaun WilliamsDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Tony CarterDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
A'mari WilsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Jameer LewisDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Jeffery RushDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles3
Josh JohnsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles6
JR StegallDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles7
Nasim CairoDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack10
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles8
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth52
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Gavin TaylorLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Joshua OforLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks0
Kam MooreLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Robert StevensLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Defense Tackles22
Defense Unassisted Tackles14
Defense Sacks1
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant4
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth52
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Avery SledgeLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Laquan RobinsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles15
Defense Sacks0
Mathis HaygoodLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles16
Defense Tackles23
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0.5
Melvin SpriggsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles10
Defense Unassisted Tackles6
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster13
Player profiles13
Current0
Relevant13
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth169
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
AG McGheeS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Braden JacksonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Brandon BarnesS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Brandon GreilS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Dontrae HendersonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return17
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Five HamiltonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return91
Defense Assisted Tackles5
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster14
Player profiles14
Current0
Relevant14
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth182
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Baron TaylorDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Cannon McClainDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ishmael IbraheemCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jonah MartinezCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Jyaire BrownCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Kelby HamptonCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
ASArkansas State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Clune Van AndelPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
SMSouthern Miss
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth33
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Luke BeardLS
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Reed HarradinePK
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Creighton WilbanksPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards66.7
Kicking Field Goals Made9
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
103 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Arkansas State43 player profiles · 0 current
Trey OwensQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost44
Passing Yards593
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.4
Passing Touchdowns3
Ezell JollyRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards74
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards11
Hunter SummersWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards154
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.1
Receiving Longest Reception40
Receiving Receptions9
Donquarius ParkerDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Gavin TaylorLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
AG McGheeS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Clune Van AndelPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made11
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct2
James Lee— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Southern Miss60 player profiles · 0 current
Ethan HamptonQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost8
Passing Yards419
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg5.6
Passing Touchdowns2
Jamarice WilderRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards120
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.2
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards-2
Jeremiah DillonWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
A'mari WilsonDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Avery SledgeLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles9
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks0
Baron TaylorDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Luke BeardLS · Specialists
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Steven Robinson— · Other
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
