A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayArizona State
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 3:30 pm
HomeTexas Tech
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Arizona State49 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Texas Tech48 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeTEXA +14.8Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeTEXA +15.4Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context3.6 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
ASArizona State
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
TTTexas Tech
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: TEXA +15.4 across at least 5 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
ARIZ has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
AS lean · High confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Arizona State
Outperform the overall team gapARIZ does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Lean on the schedule-tested profileThis side has faced the stronger opponent-adjusted schedule; its path improves if that tested profile transfers cleanly into this matchup.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Texas Tech
Make the overall team edge holdTEXA owns the stronger overall team read; the cleanest path is for that broad advantage to remain representative.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
No current stored market reference is available.
The Game Hub does not fetch odds on page load. Market context appears only after the normal Sports Data pipeline stores it locally.
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupArizona State role shape ↔ Texas Tech secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two40.0% / 78.0%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Arizona State has a mixed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Omarion Miller. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Texas Tech secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupArizona State role shape ↔ Texas Tech front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two58.1% / 73.0%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Arizona State has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Kyson Brown. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Texas Tech front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupTexas Tech role shape ↔ Arizona State secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two30.2% / 55.8%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Texas Tech has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Kenny Johnson. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Arizona State secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupTexas Tech role shape ↔ Arizona State front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two41.8% / 82.7%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Texas Tech has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Cameron Dickey. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Arizona State front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
ASArizona State
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
TTTexas Tech
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
ASRoster context only
0%
TTRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
ASBuilding
59%
TTBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth27
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Cutter BoleyQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost28
Passing Yards736
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns9
Mikey KeeneQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards32
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4.6
Passing Touchdowns0
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth43
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Thomas CastellanosQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards8
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4
Passing Touchdowns1
Will HammondQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost29
Passing Yards744
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.6
Passing Touchdowns3
Kirk FrancisQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards0
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg0
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth76
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Grayson RigdonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards26
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards110
Jason Brown Jr.RB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards60
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg12
Rushing Touchdowns1
Defense Assisted Tackles0
David AvitRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards12
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards13
Kyson BrownRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards227
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.3
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards20
Marquis GillisRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards73
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.6
Rushing Touchdowns1
Receiving Yards8
Demarius RobinsonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards27
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.8
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts4
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster4
Player profiles4
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth38
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adam HillRB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Cameron DickeyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards136
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.3
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards21
J'Koby WilliamsRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards249
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.2
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards87
Quinten JoynerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards77
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4.5
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts17
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth63
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Derek EusebioWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
James GiggeyTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
AJ IaTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards19
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.5
Receiving Longest Reception12
Receiving Receptions2
Cory Butler Jr.WR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards17
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg8.5
Receiving Longest Reception13
Receiving Receptions2
Jalen MossWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards23
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.5
Receiving Longest Reception14
Receiving Receptions2
Jaren HamiltonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards2
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg2
Receiving Longest Reception2
Receiving Receptions1
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth40
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Coy EakinWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards132
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions11
Donte Lee JrWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards17
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5.7
Receiving Longest Reception8
Receiving Receptions3
Jalen JonesWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards17
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg5.7
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions3
Jett CarpenterTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards37
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg9.3
Receiving Longest Reception18
Receiving Receptions4
Kenny JohnsonWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards230
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg17.7
Receiving Longest Reception35
Receiving Receptions13
Malcolm SimmonsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards64
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg64
Receiving Longest Reception64
Receiving Receptions1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
ASArizona State
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
TTTexas Tech
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity1 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Daniel SillOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Albert Smith IIIDE
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Blazen LonoWongDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles4
C.J. FiteDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Clayton SmithDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack6
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Jalen ThompsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack4
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles9
Joshua ShanklinDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Anthony Holmes Jr.DL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack15
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Bryce ButlerDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
Jamond MathisDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack21
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles9
Jayden CofieldDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Jojo JohnsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Julien LaventureDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles5
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster6
Player profiles6
Current0
Relevant6
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth78
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Emar'rion WinstonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks1
Isaiah IosefaLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Martell HughesLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles21
Defense Unassisted Tackles12
Defense Sacks0
Owen LongLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles13
Defense Tackles25
Defense Unassisted Tackles12
Defense Sacks0
Prayer YoungBlackgoatLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks0
Tristan BaconLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adam TrickLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1
Ansel NedoreLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Austin RomaineLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles9
Defense Tackles19
Defense Unassisted Tackles10
Defense Sacks0
Ben RobertsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles11
Defense Tackles25
Defense Unassisted Tackles14
Defense Sacks1
Brock GolwasLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Charles Anderson Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Adrian WilsonS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Ashton StampsCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Ben AlefaioLiliiS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Caleb ChesterDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Jessiah McGrewDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Kyan McDonaldDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Amier BoydMatthewsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return-1
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Brenden JordanDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Brice PollockDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Davin MartinCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Malik EsquerraDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Marcus RamonEdwardsDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
ASArizona State
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth19
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Carson SmithPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made13
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Carston KiefferPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made2
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
TTTexas Tech
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth7
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Stone HarringtonPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made12
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
97 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Arizona State49 player profiles · 0 current
Cutter BoleyQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost28
Passing Yards736
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8.8
Passing Touchdowns9
Grayson RigdonRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards26
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.7
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards110
Derek EusebioWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Albert Smith IIIDE · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Emar'rion WinstonLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles3
Defense Sacks1
Adrian WilsonS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles8
Carson SmithPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made13
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Jake Fette— · Other
Earlier data
Passing Attempts2
Passing Completion Pct50
Passing Completions1
Passing Interceptions0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Texas Tech48 player profiles · 0 current
Thomas CastellanosQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards8
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg4
Passing Touchdowns1
Adam HillRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Coy EakinWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards132
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12
Receiving Longest Reception32
Receiving Receptions11
Anthony Holmes Jr.DL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks2.5
Defense Yards Lost On Sack15
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles8
Adam TrickLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles8
Defense Unassisted Tackles5
Defense Sacks1
Amier BoydMatthewsDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return-1
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Stone HarringtonPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards80
Kicking Field Goals Made12
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct4
Daniel SillOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
