A matchup-first view of the team Battlefield, stored market context, player production, availability, usage patterns and meaningful personnel changes. Public betting opportunities are shown only when a model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow outputs remain non-public.
AwayAlabama
FBS MATCHUPPREGAMEOctober 17, 2026 · 3:30 pm
HomeTennessee
Game Intelligence Overview
What stands out before kickoff
Start with the team-level Battlefield, then use player and personnel context to understand what is behind the matchup.
BattlefieldMatchup read ready
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read for this matchup.
Position contextStill building
0 paired position groups have enough stored evidence for deeper context.
Alabama47 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Tennessee58 player profiles
Evidence coverage 59.0% · based on a 3-game team sample
Personnel availabilityUnknown
0 away / 0 home explicit designation(s). Unknown means no qualifying availability report is stored — not that every player is healthy or available.
FBS Matchup Battlefield
The team-level football read
This is the directional layer for the matchup. Player and personnel context below helps explain the picture but does not silently change the Battlefield.
Overall edgeALAB +0.8Broad team read; this game’s betting line is excluded
Recent-form edgeALAB +5.2Current-season results only
Evidence depthCurrent-seasonHow much current-season evidence supports the read
Historical context4.1 ptsHow much earlier team evidence still moves the overall read
Matchup levelFBS vs FBSSame-level FBS matchup
This team-level read does not use the target game betting line. Player and availability context appears separately and does not silently change the Battlefield.
Personnel & Availability
Key availability questions entering the matchup
Current state + recent movement
AAlabama
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
TTennessee
Minimal impact
0 tracked availability concernsNo concentrated unit impact
No active availability designations in the latest Team snapshot.
Personnel impact is qualitative and evidence-weighted. Recent movement is derived only from successive local snapshots; the current designation remains the scoring input and Spinnable does not infer replacement-player quality or starter status.
College Football Battlefield
What the matchup evidence says
EdgeConfidence
A team-level read built from results, schedule strength and current-season context. Player and availability information is shown separately below.
Shows the current-season-only read. Early samples carry less confidence and are shown beside the broader team read rather than replacing it.
Evidence: Current-season-only projected margin: ALAB +5.2 across at least 6 current Game(s) per side.
CFB Game Shape
How stable is the pregame picture?
Game Shape describes the evidence environment, not a betting recommendation.
Competitive BalanceHigh confidence
One-sidedTight
How close the independent projected margin is before any target-game market input.
Outcome VolatilityHigh confidence
TighterWider
The stored FBS margin distribution widens when evidence is thinner or the matchup is structurally less certain.
Signal AgreementHigh confidence
ConflictedAligned
How closely the current-season read agrees with the broader team read.
Current-Season DepthHigh confidence
ThinEstablished
How much current-season game evidence supports the matchup read.
Historical ContextHigh confidence
LightHeavy
How much earlier team evidence still influences the current matchup read.
CFB Pressure Points
Where the evidence carries the most tension
1
ALAB has the stronger schedule test
Opponent-adjusted schedule quality is one of the clearest supported differences in the current team-level evidence.
A lean · High confidence
Evidence-Based Paths
What each side needs the current signals to get right
Alabama
Outperform the overall team gapALAB does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Validate the current-season signalThe current-only read is favorable; making that newer evidence hold would strengthen the case beyond the historical blend.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Tennessee
Outperform the overall team gapTENN does not begin with the stronger broad rating, so its path requires the current matchup to outperform the broader team read.
Make the secondary evidence matterNo large schedule or current-form edge is carrying the case by itself, so the result depends more heavily on the broad strength signal and normal game variance.
Win inside the more stable projectionThe evidence distribution is comparatively tighter, placing more weight on whether the supported team-level advantages actually show up.
Market Opportunities
Separate the market from the football read
Stored lines are reference data. A public opportunity appears here only when its model is explicitly approved for the customer feed; CFB Shadow output cannot leak through the Game Hub.
Betting Operating ContextNo active public recommendation
The matchup intelligence remains useful even when no wager is currently in the customer-facing Qualified or Watch feed.
Current state
Your relationshipSign in to connect Saved Opportunities and Portfolio contextThe game-level recommendation state remains the same for every reader.
Meaningful changeNo recent material changeThe Hub will surface a material betting-lifecycle or matchup-context change here when one is stored.
One decision lifecycleGame Hub explains the matchup and evidence. Betting Intelligence manages the decision, Timing, saved state, execution, Portfolio exposure, and review without changing the underlying model recommendation.
Stored market reference1xBet
Fresh · 5.8 hr old
SpreadPair integrity
UnavailableCanonical pair not verified
Moneyline2 sides
Tennessee+164
Alabama-217
Total2 sides
Over +56.5-120
Under +56.5-108
No public CFB model opportunity is active for this game.
CFB Moneyline and Spread remain governed Shadow lanes. The stored lines above are market reference only and do not imply a Spinnable recommendation.
Decision boundary
The projected football margin is created without the target game spread. Stored prices are introduced afterward for market comparison. Battlefield context, this Game Hub, and staff-only Shadow review cannot change qualification, Opportunity Score, lifecycle state, or promotion readiness. This panel makes no provider request.
Personnel Matchup Watchpoints
Where do player usage patterns meet the opposing unit?
Passing and rushing usage patterns are paired with the opposing defensive group to surface descriptive watchpoints. They do not score the matchup.
Matchup views4
Usage patterns4
Ready watchpoints0
Additional context0
Passing matchupAlabama role shape ↔ Tennessee secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two31.9% / 57.4%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Alabama has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Lotzeir Brooks. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Tennessee secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupAlabama role shape ↔ Tennessee front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternConcentrated
Primary usage / top two74.5% / 94.1%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Alabama has a concentrated recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by Daniel Hill. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Tennessee front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Passing matchupTennessee role shape ↔ Alabama secondary evidence
Collecting
Usage patternDistributed
Primary usage / top two26.3% / 47.4%
Player contextQB + receivers · Building
Defensive contextSecondary · Building
Tennessee has a distributed recorded receptions usage pattern led by Mike Matthews. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Alabama secondary context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
Rushing matchupTennessee role shape ↔ Alabama front-seven evidence
Collecting
Usage patternMixed
Primary usage / top two40.6% / 67.9%
Player contextBackfield · Building
Defensive contextFront seven · Building
Tennessee has a mixed recorded rushing attempts usage pattern led by DeSean Bishop. Compare that involvement pattern with the available Alabama front seven context as something to watch, not as a matchup edge.
How to use these watchpoints
They describe how recorded player involvement meets the opposing defensive group. They do not infer scheme, starters, unit quality, a personnel edge or a betting recommendation.
Personnel & Availability
What do available reports say about participation?
Only explicit, source-attributed availability information appears here. Missing statistics are never treated as an injury.
AAlabama
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
TTennessee
Unknown
Reported0
Unavailable0
Uncertain0
No qualifying availability report is available for this team.
That means availability is unknown here — not that every player is healthy, active or expected to start.
Availability note
A player appearing on a roster, being absent from a stat line or having a zero in a box score does not establish injury, availability or starter status.
Personnel Changes
Has the personnel picture materially changed?
Only meaningful changes between comparable pregame states appear here. Ordinary statistical refreshes do not create a change alert.
Personnel change trackingTrack material personnel changes
Alerts report bounded evidence movement only. They never imply an injury, starter change, matchup edge, bet, or projection adjustment.
Change historyBuilding a comparable pregame baseline
More than one compatible pregame snapshot is needed before meaningful movement can be identified.
What a change means
A change flag means the stored personnel evidence moved materially. It does not by itself establish injury, starter status, player quality, a matchup edge, projected-margin movement or wager value.
Player & Position Context
Explore the supporting player evidence
Detailed player and position-group evidence is available on demand so the matchup read stays compact and readable.
Position groupsEvidence coverage by position group
0 groups ready
Open a position group to inspect evidence coverage, sample size and representative player production. Coverage is not a rating of unit quality.
QuarterbackBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
BackfieldBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
ReceiversBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
Offensive LineRoster context only
ARoster context only
0%
TRoster context only
0%
Defensive FrontBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
LinebackersBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
SecondaryBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
SpecialistsBuilding
ABuilding
59%
TBuilding
59%
Choose a position group
Open a group to inspect evidence depth, sample size and representative player production.
Position Evidence
Quarterback
Current-season passing and quarterback rushing production represented in the available player data.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant1
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth21
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Keelon RussellQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost44
Passing Yards764
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.2
Passing Touchdowns4
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster2
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth22
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
George MacIntyreQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards56
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8
Passing Touchdowns1
Ryan StaubQB
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards27
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9
Passing Touchdowns0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Backfield
Rushing and receiving production represented for running backs and related backfield identities.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles3
Current0
Relevant3
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daniel HillRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards210
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.5
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards41
Kevin RileyRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards35
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg3.5
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts10
Khalifa KeithRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards12
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Rushing Attempts3
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster5
Player profiles5
Current0
Relevant5
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth40
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Daune MorrisRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards234
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.1
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards9
DeSean BishopRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards286
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.7
Rushing Touchdowns4
Receiving Yards30
Javin GordonRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards79
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg4
Rushing Touchdowns0
Receiving Yards18
Hunter BarnesRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards75
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg6.8
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts11
Justin BakerRB
Earlier data
Rushing Yards89
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg29.7
Rushing Touchdowns1
Rushing Attempts3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Receivers
Receiving production represented for wide receivers and tight ends without inferring depth-chart roles.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster7
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth63
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Lotzeir BrooksWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards178
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.9
Receiving Longest Reception40
Receiving Receptions15
Marshall PritchettTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards42
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14
Receiving Longest Reception27
Receiving Receptions3
Ryan WilliamsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards235
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg19.6
Receiving Longest Reception58
Receiving Receptions12
Danny Lewis Jr.TE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards4
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg4
Receiving Longest Reception4
Receiving Receptions1
Derek MeadowsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards44
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.7
Receiving Longest Reception31
Receiving Receptions3
Kaleb EdwardsTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards55
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg13.8
Receiving Longest Reception20
Receiving Receptions4
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth58
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Isaiah HardgeWR
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Braylon StaleyWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards87
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg12.4
Receiving Longest Reception35
Receiving Receptions7
Dasaahn BrameTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards7
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg7
Receiving Longest Reception7
Receiving Receptions1
Deon HardinWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards11
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11
Receiving Longest Reception11
Receiving Receptions1
Ethan DavisTE
Earlier data
Receiving Yards43
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg14.3
Receiving Longest Reception25
Receiving Receptions3
Mike MatthewsWR
Earlier data
Receiving Yards189
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg18.9
Receiving Longest Reception57
Receiving Receptions10
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Offensive Line
Roster context only. Individual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data.
AAlabama
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster1
Player profiles1
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth13
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identity1 offensive-line players are represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
Racin DelgattyOL
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
TTennessee
Roster context only
Data coverage0%
Roster0
Player profiles0
Current0
Relevant0
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth0
Why this evidence is shown this way
Roster identityNo offensive-line players are currently represented in the stored roster context.
Individual line-play data unavailableIndividual offensive-line performance statistics are not available in the current data, so this group remains roster context only.
Representative player profiles
No supported player profiles are represented in this position group yet.
More current-season player data may be needed before this position group has enough supporting context.
Roster-context boundary
Roster identity can be represented, but individual offensive-line performance is not available here. No line-play rating or matchup edge is inferred.
Position Evidence
Defensive Front
Stored defensive production represented for front-line defenders, including supported tackle, sack and disruption families.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Devan ThompkinsDT
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3
Defense Yards Lost On Sack18
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles12
Edric HillDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Fatutoa HenryDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack3
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Isaia FagaDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Defense Tackles3
Kedrick BingleJonesDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles5
London SimmonsDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles4
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles7
Current0
Relevant7
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth91
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Carson GentleDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Ethan UtleyDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Isaiah CampbellDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Mariyon DyeDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3
Defense Yards Lost On Sack15
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles6
Nathan RobinsonDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles4
Tyree WeathersbyDL
Earlier data
Defense Sacks1
Defense Yards Lost On Sack8
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles4
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Linebackers
Stored defensive production represented for linebackers across supported tackle, sack, turnover and defensive families.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster9
Player profiles9
Current0
Relevant9
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth117
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Abduall Sanders Jr.LB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Caleb WoodsonLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles10
Defense Tackles18
Defense Unassisted Tackles8
Defense Sacks2
Desmond UmeozuluLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Duke Johnson IILB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
JahMarien LathamLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Justin HillLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles6
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks1
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster8
Player profiles8
Current0
Relevant8
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth104
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Amare CampbellLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles11
Defense Sacks0
Arion CarterLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Defense Tackles16
Defense Unassisted Tackles12
Defense Sacks1
Edwin SpillmanLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles12
Defense Unassisted Tackles7
Defense Sacks1
Jadon PerlotteLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles3
Defense Unassisted Tackles2
Defense Sacks0
Jeremiah TelanderLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles7
Defense Tackles11
Defense Unassisted Tackles4
Defense Sacks1
Jordan BurnsLB
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles1
Defense Unassisted Tackles0
Defense Sacks0
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Secondary
Stored defensive production represented for defensive backs across supported interception, defended-pass, tackle and turnover families.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster10
Player profiles10
Current0
Relevant10
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth130
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Bray HubbardDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return24
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Carmelo O'nealS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Chuck McDonald IIIDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Dijon Lee Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Dre Kirkpatrick Jr.DB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Ivan TaylorDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles3
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster11
Player profiles11
Current0
Relevant11
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth143
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Dejuan LaneS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return41
Defense Assisted Tackles3
DJ BurksDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Dylan LewisDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles4
Kayin LeeCB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Mar'Quavious MossS
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Sidney WaltonDB
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Position Evidence
Specialists
Stored kicking, punting and return production represented for specialist identities.
AAlabama
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth20
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Lorcan QuinnPK
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Conor TaltyPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made15
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct8
TTennessee
Building
Data coverage59%
Roster3
Player profiles2
Current0
Relevant2
Team sample3 games
Metric breadth27
Why this evidence is shown this way
Data readinessThe position group does not yet meet the current data-readiness requirements.
Current-season sample3 completed games meet the current full-sample threshold.
Data coverage59% remains below the minimum coverage threshold for developing context.
Representative player profiles
Josh TurbyvillePK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made1
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Cooper RanvierPK
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards100
Kicking Field Goals Made17
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct3
Supporting evidence only
This evidence describes coverage, freshness and sample depth. It does not rate the unit, infer starters or create a matchup edge.
Player productionSeason production represented in this matchup
105 profiles
These season production profiles provide context for who is represented in the data. They are not player rankings or starter projections.
Alabama47 player profiles · 0 current
Keelon RussellQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost44
Passing Yards764
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg9.2
Passing Touchdowns4
Daniel HillRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards210
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg5.5
Rushing Touchdowns3
Receiving Yards41
Lotzeir BrooksWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Receiving Yards178
Receiving Yards Per Reception Avg11.9
Receiving Longest Reception40
Receiving Receptions15
Devan ThompkinsDT · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks3
Defense Yards Lost On Sack18
Defense Assisted Tackles5
Defense Tackles12
Abduall Sanders Jr.LB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles1
Defense Tackles2
Defense Unassisted Tackles1
Defense Sacks0
Bray HubbardDB · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return24
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Lorcan QuinnPK · Specialists
Earlier data
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Intercepted Returned Yards0
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns0
Defense Longest Interception Return0
Racin DelgattyOL · Offensive Line
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
Tennessee58 player profiles · 0 current
George MacIntyreQB · Quarterback
Earlier data
Passing Sacked Yards Lost0
Passing Yards56
Passing Yards Per Pass Avg8
Passing Touchdowns1
Daune MorrisRB · Backfield
Earlier data
Rushing Yards234
Rushing Yards Per Rush Avg8.1
Rushing Touchdowns2
Receiving Yards9
Isaiah HardgeWR · Receivers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles0
Defense Forced Fumbles0
Defense Fumbles Recovered0
Defense Fumbles Returned For Touchdowns0
Carson GentleDL · Defensive Front
Earlier data
Defense Sacks0
Defense Yards Lost On Sack0
Defense Assisted Tackles2
Defense Tackles2
Amare CampbellLB · Linebackers
Earlier data
Defense Assisted Tackles6
Defense Tackles17
Defense Unassisted Tackles11
Defense Sacks0
Dejuan LaneS · Secondary
Earlier data
Defense Interceptions1
Defense Interceptions Returned For Touchdowns1
Defense Longest Interception Return41
Defense Assisted Tackles3
Josh TurbyvillePK · Specialists
Earlier data
Kicking Field Goals Attempts100
Kicking Field Goals From 1 19 Yards0
Kicking Field Goals Made1
Kicking Field Goals Made Pct0
Faizon Brandon— · Other
Earlier data
Passing Attempts64
Passing Completion Pct64.1
Passing Completions41
Passing Interceptions0
Player production is descriptive context. It does not establish starter status, availability, player ranking or a matchup advantage.
How to Read This Hub
What the intelligence does — and does not — claim
Team Battlefield
Opponent-adjusted team evidence supplies the directional football read.
Player context
Player production, position-group coverage and usage patterns help explain the matchup but do not silently change the team model.
Availability
Only explicit reported participation information is shown. Missing data is treated as unknown.
Change tracking
Meaningful pregame evidence movement can be tracked, but a change flag is not automatically an advantage or recommendation.
Not inferred
The Hub does not infer starters, depth order, replacement value, scheme, snap expectations or injury status from missing statistics.
Take Spinnable Sports with you
Install the app for faster access, offline reading, picks, and podcasts.
App update ready
Refresh to use the latest Spinnable Sports features and fixes.
Mobile Experience
App Tools
iPhone & iPad
Add Spinnable Sports to your Home Screen
First open this page in Safari. Other iPhone browsers cannot launch the Home Screen installation flow from this button.
Tap ShareUse the square-and-arrow Share button in Safari’s toolbar.
Choose Add to Home ScreenScroll the Share sheet if the option is not immediately visible.
Tap AddThe Spinnable Sports icon will appear with your other apps.
Apple does not currently allow websites to open this installation sheet automatically, so these final taps must be completed in Safari.
Contributors & Editors
Create in the installed app
Sign in with your existing WordPress staff account to open the role-aware Spinnable Dashboard and creation tools.
